PayloopPayloop
CommunityVoicesToolsDiscoverLeaderboardReportsBlog
Save Up to 65% on AI
Powered by Payloop — LLM Cost Intelligence
Tools/Mode/vs Count
Mode

Mode

ai-analytics
vs
Count

Count

ai-analytics

Mode vs Count — Comparison

Pain: 1/10020 integrations10 featuresMerger / Acquisition
Pain: 1/1008 integrations10 featuresSeries A
The Bottom Line

Count and Mode are both strong contenders in the AI-analytics space, but they cater to slightly different needs. Count boasts a higher average rating of 4.8/5 from 20 reviews, focusing on collaborative data exploration and integration. Mode, with an average rating of 4.2/5 from 3 reviews, emphasizes business intelligence through SQL, R, and Python integration with a focus on user-friendly analytics.

Best for

Mode is the better choice when a larger team requires robust business intelligence capabilities for tasks like sales forecasting and financial reporting with rapid query iteration and centralized data access.

Best for

Count is the better choice when real-time collaboration on data insights is crucial for small agile teams focusing on building complex data models and creating interactive reports.

Key Differences

  • 1.Count offers a free pricing tier starting at $0, with additional tiers at $49 and $69, while specific pricing details for Mode are unavailable.
  • 2.Count supports integrations with Slack, Google Sheets, and Salesforce, whereas Mode connects with Google BigQuery, Amazon Redshift, and Snowflake.
  • 3.Mode integrates SQL, R, and Python for comprehensive analytics, while Count combines SQL, Python, and charts side by side for a narrative-driven approach.
  • 4.Count's company size is about 15 employees with Series A funding of $5M, in contrast to Mode's 53 employees and $279.4M raised through merger/acquisition.
  • 5.Users of Count commend its ease of use and comprehensive features, earning it a higher average rating of 4.8/5, whereas Mode users appreciate its business intelligence capabilities but note a steeper learning curve with a 4.2/5 rating.

Verdict

Count is more favorable for smaller teams emphasizing collaborative data modeling and live insights sharing. On the other hand, Mode aligns better with larger teams needing extensive data integration for business intelligence. Both tools offer distinct strengths, making the decision dependent on specific team needs and technical requirements.

Overview
What each tool does and who it's for

Mode

Mode is a collaborative data platform that combines SQL, R, Python, and visual analytics in one place. Connect, analyze, and share, faster.

User reviews for Mode are generally positive, highlighting its ease of use and powerful data analysis features as key strengths, reflected in two 4.5/5 ratings and one 3.5/5 rating on G2. However, some users express dissatisfaction with the learning curve required to master advanced functionalities. There is limited information on specific pricing sentiment for Mode, but its overall reputation remains solid among data professionals seeking robust business intelligence tools. Pricing details are not specifically mentioned in the provided data excerpts.

Count

The only collaborative agentic analytics platform. Everything you need to make AI insights actionable, accurate, and actually useful.

Count has received high user praise on review platforms like g2, consistently achieving ratings around 4.5-5 out of 5, which speaks to its strong reputation for reliability and effectiveness. Users frequently highlight its comprehensive feature set and ease of use as major strengths. However, there were minimal mentions of any specific complaints in the available reviews and social discourse. The sentiment surrounding pricing is generally positive, with the value proposition seen as favorable. Overall, Count is viewed positively within its user community.

Key Metrics
4.2★ (3)
Avg Rating
4.8★ (20)
92
Mentions (30d)
52
Mention Velocity
How discussion volume is trending week-over-week

Mode

+28% vs last week

Count

+52% vs last week
Where People Discuss
Mention distribution across platforms

Mode

Reddit
66%
Lemmy
10%
Rss
7%
Tiktok
5%
GitHub
4%
Dev.to
3%

Count

Reddit
56%
Lemmy
31%
GitHub
4%
Rss
3%
YouTube
2%
Hacker News
2%
Community Sentiment
How developers feel about each tool based on mentions and reviews

Mode

14% positive83% neutral3% negative

Count

14% positive76% neutral10% negative
Pricing

Mode

tiered

Count

tieredFree tier

Pricing found: $0, $49, $69

Use Cases
When to use each tool

Mode (10)

Data-driven decision makingBusiness performance analysisMarketing campaign analysisSales forecastingCustomer behavior analysisFinancial reportingOperational efficiency trackingProduct performance evaluationData team collaborationExecutive dashboards

Count (8)

Collaborative data exploration and analysisBuilding complex data models step by stepCreating interactive reports and dashboardsReal-time collaboration on data insightsIdentifying business bottlenecks through data analysisIntegrating raw data from various apps and databasesDefining reusable logic for data queriesSharing live data insights via Slack or email
Features

Only in Mode (10)

SQL query executionAd hoc analysis capabilitiesSelf-service reporting toolsIntegration of SQL, R, and PythonData visualization toolsCentralized data hubRapid query iterationUser-friendly interfaceCurated data accessFast implementation time

Only in Count (10)

Clean, model, analyze and visualize in one place.Use SQL, Python and charts side by side.Lay out your work, add context, and build a narrative as you go.Build step by step, or let Count's agent take it further, faster.Every query, transformation and chart is fully editable and auditable.Go deeper with an agent that can run hundreds of analyzes in minutes.Collaborate in real time, right alongside your team.Review findings, challenge assumptions, and iterate together.Move from analysis to next steps - as a team.Spend vs. Revenue
Integrations

Shared (7)

TableauLookerZapierSlackGitHubSalesforceMicrosoft Excel

Only in Mode (13)

Google BigQueryAmazon RedshiftSnowflakePostgreSQLMySQLMicrosoft SQL ServerJupyter NotebooksStripeSegmentMixpanelHubSpotZendeskGoogle Analytics

Only in Count (1)

Google Sheets
What Users Say
Top reviews from G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius

Mode

What do you like best about MODE?1.Advanced analytics capabilities 2.Advanced reporting 3. Great visualization Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about MODE?1. Higher cost as compared to similar products in the market Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

4.5\u2605Rahul R.g2

What do you like best about MODE?It was helpful to speed up process and bringing all services together Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about MODE?I didn't have any at the moment but I will share soon if any Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

4.5\u2605JAYAKUMAR M.g2

What do you like best about MODE?Mode is very handy in terms of easy access and share results among colleagues. People from the same team can easily see the underlying query. It also offer different charts for visualization. Refresh is also very easy (you just need to hit one button or you can schedule a refresh at your preferred time) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about MODE?Compared to Tableau, it lacks some advanced functions. Like calculated fields. So if you want to see the results grouped by different granularity, you have to do them in a separate query. There is also no dynamic filtering. Another thing that is not convenient is that if you refresh the report and it is not successful, it will show you the blank error report instead of the previous successful run or having any options to choose which successful run you would like to see. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

3.5\u2605Verified User in Computer Softwareg2

Count

What do you like best about Count?I like how easy it is to pull data from different sources and bring it together into a comprehensive, easy-to-use dashboard. Also, having the ability to run SQL queries and Python scripts in one place makes things much easier and more flexible whenever we need to process data. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about Count?This tool has a bit of a learning curve, and you need to get past that before you can really see its full value. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

5.0\u2605Juan Ignacio P.g2

What do you like best about Count?I love that Count is flexible and easy to understand, especially for someone like me who is not an engineer. The canvas layout is visually helpful, which makes it really nice to work with. The team's great and very helpful, which I really appreciate. Most BI tools are unusable for someone like myself, but Count allows me to understand data without relying on others. The initial setup was very easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about Count?N/A Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

5.0\u2605Tyler L.g2

What do you like best about Count?That I can look at visualisations but then easily jump into the underlying data in an understand way as a layman. The AI functionality is also helpful, it shows its workings and the data can be reviewed the same way as mentioned above. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about Count?What I dislike about the product probably stems from my own need for some basic training. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

5.0\u2605Ben T.g2
Pain Points
Top complaints from reviews and social mentions

Mode

llm (11)large language model (11)openai (11)token usage (10)API costs (10)ai agent (10)token cost (10)claude (9)anthropic (7)gpt (7)

Count

token usage (10)ai agent (4)token cost (4)anthropic (3)claude (3)API costs (3)$500 bill (3)API bill (2)openai (2)gpt (2)
Top Discussion Keywords
Most mentioned keywords from community discussions

Mode

llm (11)large language model (11)openai (11)token usage (10)API costs (10)ai agent (10)token cost (10)claude (9)anthropic (7)gpt (7)usage monitoring (7)raises (5)

Count

token usage (10)ai agent (4)token cost (4)anthropic (3)claude (3)API costs (3)$500 bill (3)API bill (2)openai (2)gpt (2)budget (2)raised (2)
Latest Videos
Recent uploads from official YouTube channels

Mode

No YouTube channel

Count

Principles for Better Data Design: Draw Focus To What Matters Most

Principles for Better Data Design: Draw Focus To What Matters Most

Mar 9, 2026

Principles For Better Data Design: Using Context to Improve Comprehension

Principles For Better Data Design: Using Context to Improve Comprehension

Mar 9, 2026

Principles for Better Data Design: Organize & Stylize

Principles for Better Data Design: Organize & Stylize

Mar 9, 2026

How to Tell Better Data Stories: Utilizing the Three-Act Structure

How to Tell Better Data Stories: Utilizing the Three-Act Structure

Mar 9, 2026

Product Screenshots

Mode

Mode screenshot 1Mode screenshot 2Mode screenshot 3Mode screenshot 4

Count

Count screenshot 1Count screenshot 2Count screenshot 3Count screenshot 4
What People Talk About
Most discussed topics from community mentions

Mode

model selection85
cost optimization62
api55
pricing55
scalability46
open source45
streaming42
performance41

Count

api52
scalability43
streaming43
open source41
cost optimization41
support37
security36
deployment36
Top Community Mentions
Highest-engagement mentions from the community

Mode

OpenAI just released o1 and their new $200 / month ChatGPT Pro plan. It includes unlimited access to the o1 reasoning model, which is smarter, faster, and better at solving complex problems than ever

OpenAI just released o1 and their new $200 / month ChatGPT Pro plan. It includes unlimited access to the o1 reasoning model, which is smarter, faster, and better at solving complex problems than ever before. This model can even analyze images now, making it a powerhouse for tasks like coding, math,

Tiktokby @rileybrown.aineutral source

Count

X Users Find Their Real Names Are Being Googled in Israel After Using X Verification Software “Au10tix”

X Users Find Their Real Names Are Being Googled in Israel After Using X Verification Software “Au10tix” Alan Macleod On January 30, the Department of Justice released its latest tranche of 3.5 million documents relating to Jeffrey Epstein. Years of emails, texts, and images were suddenly in the public

Lemmyby andybytespositive source
Company Intel
information technology & services
Industry
information technology & services
53
Employees
15
$279.4M
Funding
$5.0M
Merger / Acquisition
Stage
Series A
Supported Languages & Categories

Only in Mode (3)

SecurityAnalyticsDeveloper Tools

Only in Count (5)

analyticsdata visualizationbusiness intelligencedashboardsdata modeling
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Count or Mode better for [specific use case]?▼

Count is better for collaborative data exploration, while Mode excels in business intelligence and financial reporting.

How does Count pricing compare to Mode?▼

Count has a transparent tiered pricing structure starting at $0, whereas Mode's pricing is unspecified in available data.

Which has better community support, Count or Mode?▼

Count has more documented community support and higher average user ratings, indicating stronger community engagement.

Can Count and Mode be used together?▼

Yes, as they both integrate with platforms like Slack and Tableau, allowing for combined use cases.

Which is easier to get started with, Count or Mode?▼

Count is generally considered easier to get started with due to its high user praise for ease of use and comprehensive features.

View Mode Profile View Count Profile