Build production-grade applications with a Postgres database, Authentication, instant APIs, Realtime, Functions, Storage and Vector embeddings. Start
Supabase garners positive feedback for its seamless integration and ease of use, particularly among developers who appreciate its database management capabilities and scalability. However, some users have expressed difficulties with specific functionalities and performance issues, such as slow query execution. Pricing sentiment appears to be neutral, as users find it competitive yet suitable for smaller projects. Overall, Supabase maintains a strong reputation as a robust, open-source alternative to Firebase, particularly valued by developers for its community-driven support and flexibility.
Mentions (30d)
25
1 this week
Reviews
0
Platforms
2
Sentiment
19%
13 positive
Supabase garners positive feedback for its seamless integration and ease of use, particularly among developers who appreciate its database management capabilities and scalability. However, some users have expressed difficulties with specific functionalities and performance issues, such as slow query execution. Pricing sentiment appears to be neutral, as users find it competitive yet suitable for smaller projects. Overall, Supabase maintains a strong reputation as a robust, open-source alternative to Firebase, particularly valued by developers for its community-driven support and flexibility.
Features
Use Cases
Industry
information technology & services
Employees
350
Funding Stage
Series E
Total Funding
$696.1M
192,774
Twitter followers
20
npm packages
25
HuggingFace models
Pricing found: $10/mo, $0.00325, $0.125, $0.09, $0.03
Vibe Coding for Oldies
At the ripe old age of 62, I have ventured back into programming. Last coded something like 30 years ago. May have been a bit ambitious, I wanted a Gardening program that would track the progress of my plants on both PC and on my Android phone. Androd is way more buggy. My one advantage is that I work in IT projects, so I know the stages to follow. And have definitely not skipped the testing. Seeing an update fix one thing and then break another, took me back to my programming days. And the familiar banging my head against the wall. So this was my first attempt and I was totally dependant on Claude for the coding. Also noted that I am also dependent on the tool to recommend the sub programs like Supabase. Rapidly ran out of tokens on Netlify and had to invest in a subscription. So not the cheap experiment that I was hoping for. I am not sure this is an activity for those that are not IT savy, just too many steps and repeating uploads. Plenty frustrating. But I do think it is a useful activity for schools to do. It teaches essential information on where all these Apps come from and why they are buggy. It is easier than when I first learned coding, but it is not yet magic. submitted by /u/Particular_Cicada395 [link] [comments]
View originalUsuario Básico
Mi experiencia está siendo muy buena. No soy programador pero instale visual studio code y el plug in de Claude para probar… Al principio pedía varios prompt para realizar tareas ( crear aplicaciones para el trabajo) y en seguida se bloqueaba por falta de Tokens… todo con la cuenta de 20 €. Las últimas semanas, me di cuenta de que le pedía tareas y no paraba… la cuenta de Claude ahora dura mucho más… para un usuario como yo, más que de sobra. Hablo de pasarme toda la mañana pidiendo cambios de una aplicación de gestión de equipos y no quedarme sin tokens… la aplicación tira de Supabase y Vercel y tiene gestión de usuarios y roles, llamadas a APIS, conectores con IA… vamos que es muy básica pero completa… al principio incluso me asusté y pensé que no estaba conectado que parara de programar cuando llegas al límite… pero mirándolo en la aplicación, está desconectado… así que la conclusión es que se pueden hacer programas de una manera súper sencilla con Claude. Cualquier duda que tengáis , soy todo oídos submitted by /u/Best_Conference4490 [link] [comments]
View originalNeed Suggestion which to use? Claude Code CLI or Claude Code Desktop Or VS Code Claude Code Extension
I have been using Google Antigravity IDE, Opus 4.6 to build projects in Next.js, Supabase, Kotlin for android app. Now, I want to shift to Claude code for developing my projects. Kindly suggest which way is better to build projects? Claude Code CLI or Claude Code Desktop Or VS Code Claude Code Extension Thanks! submitted by /u/anymodelaiapp [link] [comments]
View originalIf you've built a frontend with Claude Code, here's how to connect it to a backend
So people build using Claude Code but hit the same wall, you build a frontend that looks great, but it's running on hardcoded data. No database, no auth, no real API calls. You can use one of these to connect to other systems: API are raw HTTP calls the most granular option. Think of it like buying individual pages from a bookstore. You make one specific request, you get one specific response. Maximum control, maximum setup work. Every integration starts here under the hood. SDK (Software Development Kit) is a pre-packaged wrapper around APIs. Instead of assembling raw HTTP calls yourself, someone gives you a library with clean functions like supabase.auth.signUp(). Way less boilerplate, way fewer mistakes. Supabase, Stripe, Firebase all ship SDKs that Claude Code can use directly. CLI: for deployment and infrastructure tasks. You're not calling these from your app at runtime you use them to push code live, create database tables, set up environments. Claude Code runs these for you. MCP is the newest option. Lets Claude Code connect directly to external services as tools. Instead of writing integration code, Claude just calls the service natively. You can checkout this video for tutorial. submitted by /u/InfamousInvestigator [link] [comments]
View originalOpus is ridiculous for frontend cleanup
I love Opus. First I tuned one page, got the PageSpeed result where I wanted it, and wrote the whole thing down in ADR_pagespeed-l0-fixes-playbook.md. Then I opened a fresh session, gave it the remaining 9 pages, and pointed it at the playbook. Opus created three subagents by itself, split the work between them, and about 15 minutes later they had touched 41 frontend files that powered those pages. Same result across the set. Basically perfect Lighthouse numbers again. Not gonna lie, this is the kind of workflow where I stop thinking “chatbot” and start thinking “tiny frontend team that doesn’t complain about boring cleanup.” ***upd*** A PSI playbook is basically just a messy checklist I made from fixing one page manually. I took one page, ran it through PageSpeed Insights, pasted all the PSI issues into Opus, and fixed them one by one until the score was good. After that I asked Opus to write down everything we changed into a .md file: what the issue was, what caused it in my codebase, what files were touched, how to check it after, and what not to repeat. Then for the next pages I didn’t start from zero. I gave Claude (w/o PSI report) all other frontend pages in repo + that playbook and said: use this as a checklist, don’t redo shared stuff that was already fixed, and look for the same patterns on all this pages. For me it was stuff like: font preload, GTM/gtag loading too early, Supabase SDK leaking into client chunks, hidden burger drawer hydrating before LCP, global CSS being too fat, bad Next Image sizes, ARIA/contrast fixes, etc. So it’s not really a “skill” in Claude. More like project-specific notes from the first painful cleanup pass. The useful part is that Claude stops rediscovering the same problems every page and just follows the trail. submitted by /u/Alex-S-Hamilton [link] [comments]
View originalI built an AI manuscript analysis tool for fiction writers — entirely with Claude Code
I'm a fiction writer, not a software engineer. A year ago I couldn't write a line of Python. I built FirstReader entirely with Claude — Claude Code for all development, Claude's API (Opus) as the analysis engine. What it does: FirstReader is a craft-level manuscript analysis tool for fiction writers. You upload your manuscript and get structured feedback on pacing, scene structure, dialogue, POV, showing vs. telling, and 15 other craft dimensions — grounded in established principles distilled from well known writing craft texts. It returns specific findings with quotations from your actual text, not generic advice. It's not a grammar checker. It's not a ghostwriter. It doesn't generate prose. It reads what you wrote and tells you what's working and what isn't, the way a developmental editor would — at a fraction of the cost. How Claude helped build it: - Claude Code wrote the entire codebase — Next.js frontend, Python analysis pipeline, Supabase database, GCP Cloud Run deployment - The analysis pipeline uses Claude Opus via the API to evaluate manuscripts against 319 craft principles across 15 dimensions - Built-in accuracy mechanisms: self-consistency checks (multiple analysis passes with adaptive early stopping), a finding validator, cross-dimension dedup, near-duplicate detection, and a review pass - I acted as product owner and domain expert. Claude did the engineering. The whole thing was built conversationally over about 75 sessions Free to try: There's a free AI Perception check on the site — paste in your prose and it scores how likely readers or editors would be to flag it as AI-generated, with specific pattern-level feedback. Account required (account creation is part of the upload step) because we store copyrighted material and need to access it with auth. The full manuscript analysis is paid (tiered pricing starting at $69 for non-fiction, $89 for fiction). What I learned: You don't need to know how to code to build production software with Claude Code. You need to know what you're building, why, and for whom. The domain expertise matters more than the technical skills. I learned to be an AI project manager — writing requirements, reviewing output, knowing when to be suspicious — rather than a programmer. A year in, I still can't write Python. But I shipped a product. firstreader.app submitted by /u/masonga1960 [link] [comments]
View originalClaude Code paired with Bolt.new
I use Bolt to create apps and I DO run into limits on tokens as I build. Bolt uses Supabase DBs and can connect to a GitHub repo. Want your opinion on changing my workflow a bit to save on bolt tokens. I have a Claude Code unlimited plan so if I'm not concerned about token limits in Claude, would it work to create a project in Claude Code, connect it to a repo, connect it to a Supabase DB and then once all is built, just create the project in Bolt by connecting it to the finished repo and finished DB and I'm done! If you ask "why use Bolt at all?", I answer, "Don't know! Should I not?" I mainly use it for the ease of hosting, changes, publishing, etc. All that makes Bolt kind of a one-stop shop. submitted by /u/Ok_Station4258 [link] [comments]
View originalPSA: Claude Code's VS Code extension leaked my Supabase service-role key from a momentary text-selection in a file I'd already closed, into a brand new CLI session.
If anyone has 60 seconds to try the repro on macOS/Linux to confirm it's not Windows-specific, that would help triage a lot. I filed a bug on Claude Code's VS Code extension where selection state from a closed file persists into a new CLI session — including selections made just for clipboard copy-paste, not for AI context. Closed the file, opened a different one, started a fresh claude session in a terminal, and it reported back the previously-selected lines from the closed file. Repro steps and details: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/58886 I'd selected two lines in `.env.production.local` to copy-paste a Supabase value into a dashboard — normal workflow. Then I closed the file, opened an unrelated TypeScript file, and started a fresh `claude` session in a new terminal to test something completely different. The first thing the new session did was tell me what was in the env file I'd closed, including both the publishable key and the service-role key. The IDE bridge had cached the selection past file close and served it to a session that should have been a clean slate. Rotated the keys immediately. Filed a GitHub issue with full repro: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/58886 **60-second repro if anyone wants to confirm whether this is Windows-specific:** 1. Open any file in VS Code with the Claude Code extension installed. 2. Select two lines with recognizable values (e.g. `FOO=abc` / `BAR=def`). 3. Close the file tab. 4. Open a different file. 5. Open a terminal in the same VS Code window and run `claude` (no flags). 6. Ask: "what file is open in my IDE?" 7. Note whether it reports content from the file you closed in step 3. My setup: Windows 11, Claude Code CLI 2.1.138, VS Code extension 2.1.140, PowerShell in the integrated terminal. Would especially appreciate confirmations or non-reproductions from macOS/Linux users on the issue. A quick "reproduced on [OS]" comment on the GitHub issue moves Anthropic's triage queue more than upvotes. The narrower bug (selection persisting past file close) seems independently fixable from the bigger "should IDE auto-attach be opt-in" question that's been open since February in #24726. submitted by /u/SportSpecialist2536 [link] [comments]
View originalA New Way to Explore Tech With Claude
Hi r/ClaudeAI, This project I developed was inspired by the heavy hallucinating and lazy searching that Claude and other AIs experience when searching for products. I built this website with Claude Code (praise to its Vercel and Supabase skills :) specapis.com is a new way for you to interact with Claude to find specs, release dates, reviews and more. Now live with 5000+ monitors that makes finding your perfect fit one prompt away! You can test it by pasting this into Claude: Use https://specapis.com/. My monitor question: best oled 27in It is free forever and I am planning on expanding the specs beyond monitors; to PC parts, speakers and more! submitted by /u/Consistent_Sky5871 [link] [comments]
View originalI watched a 50-person dev shop get vaporized in 12 months and the CEO is still optimistic
I rent a desk in this tech company. A year ago, 50 devs in the open space, low-code shop, big enterprise contracts. Today the upper floor is empty. Maintenance contracts only. CEO still walks the empty floor like nothing happened. Last year I told him to integrate AI hard. He said "we're protected, low-code is too specialized." 12 months later, no new clients. Here's what I missed at the time and what I think now: it's not that low-code died. It's that "low-code + AI" replaces both pure low-code AND pure full-stack. Vercel + Supabase + Claude = small team ships in days what his 50 devs ship in months. He didn't lose to full-stack. He lost to a hybrid he didn't see coming. The real point: I sat at my desk yesterday hitting my Claude Max session limit at 2pm. 1h47 to wait. Stared at the wall. Tried to code without AI. Realized I'd forgotten how. Not really, but enough to feel slow and stupid. That's when it hit me. The dev shop downstairs and me, we're the same problem at different stages. They didn't adapt and they're dying. I adapted and now I'm dependent on a server farm in Virginia that decides when I get to think well. I pay $200/month. The bill is going up. The caps are getting tighter. Anthropic is compute-constrained, Dario said it himself. There's no exit. I can't self-host Kimi K2.6, that's $450k of GPUs. Gemma 4 maybe but Google built it as bait for Vertex. The 50-dev shop is what happens if you refuse the dependency. I'm what happens if you accept it. Neither is great. I don't have a clever conclusion. Just sharing because I think a lot of people are about to figure this out the hard way and we should probably talk about it before we all hit our caps simultaneously. Reset is in 1h47. submitted by /u/Careful_Elderberry33 [link] [comments]
View originalThree browser games built with Claude (25M plays). Two of them are 8,000-line HTML files.
3 months ago I'd never written code. I asked Claude (through Cursor) to build me a memory game. My first prompt was something like: "Humans are bad at remembering color. I want a game that tests it. Show me a color, then give me sliders set to something random and let me try and recreate it. Show the results side by side and give me a score." Six hours later there was a working game. Twelve hours later, polished. Next day a database with a leaderboard. Two days later, multiplayer. That game (Color) hit 540K plays in the first week. Free to play, no signup, no app. Claude wrote essentially every line of code. I prompted, reviewed, tested, and prompted again. I didn't read documentation. I didn't learn a framework. I just kept asking Claude to add things and it did. That game was 8,000 lines of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript in a single file (lol). Multiplayer, daily challenges, leaderboards, anti-cheat. All one document. I knew this was wrong becaus eI don't really know what I'm doing. I didn't know how to do it right from the beginning (and didn't think it would matter). Game 2 (Sound) shipped the same way. Another 8,000-line file. By game 3 my son took over (I have a job I love). He wanted to ship features faster and started building the next game on Next.js + TypeScript. Game 3 (Time) shipped on the new setup. Claude wrote the bulk of that too. 3 free games at dialed.gg. 25M plays total. 200K daily players. Real ad revenue. Just me and my son who runs it day to day. No engineers, no investors. Cursor + Claude usage between us is ~$2K/mo combined. Hosting (Vercel + Supabase) ~$1.5K/mo. What I've learned: Claude is happy to extend a single file forever if you let it. It won't proactively refactor. We had to know enough to ask for the framework migration when it was time. Refactoring took effort and tokens. The new setup probably isn't done right either, but things keep working, so we keep prompting. Mostly we don't know what we're doing. We just keep prompting and shipping. Edit: Added the initial prompt. Monthly revenue is low 5 figures from display ads. submitted by /u/gteehan [link] [comments]
View originalMobile App with Clade
Just a quick question. Is building a mobile app like this actually a legit approach? I recently came across someone building fairly complex web apps, for example a geo quiz with full database integration, using this workflow: He generates all the HTML, CSS and JS through Claude (the AI), deploys it to Netlify, connects a database like Supabase or Firebase, and then uses "Add to Homescreen" so it looks and feels like a native mobile app. No framework, no GitHub repo, no CI/CD, no app store. And honestly it works. The apps are functional and pretty complex. So my questions are: Is this a legit long-term approach or will it break at some point when it comes to scaling, maintenance, payments etc.? Does anyone know a successful product built this way, just AI generated frontend code hosted on Netlify plus a backend as a service? At what point do you actually need a proper repo, a framework and a native app? For someone trying to ship fast and validate ideas, is this actually the smartest approach right now? I've been building things the proper way and now I'm questioning if I'm overcomplicating it. submitted by /u/yoloswaghipsterxx [link] [comments]
View originalSolo dev with 8 Claude windows + 1 orchestrator. AMA-ish, and tell me if I'm crazy.
Hey everyone, I'm not a senior engineer. I'm just a guy who got obsessed with what you can actually do when you stop using one AI at a time and start running a small team of them. Am doing a project where i use 8 to 10 claude code powershelle to run my project each of them have a specific function. I have Claude max 200 euros so I can use a lot of power. ight now I have 9 Claude Code windows open at the same time, each with a defined role: Major Dev — lead developer, makes the architectural calls Senior Dev — second dev, builds components and tests under Major Dev's direction Test Server — keeps the dev server alive 24/7 + runs Playwright Implémenter — handles routing and the glue code between features Débuggage — audits warnings, fixes bugs in parallel QA — walks through every screen, tests every button, checks WCAG/accessibility Graphisme — generates 2D assets (avatars, hero images, badges, mockups) Ingé Son — generates ambient music + SFX prompts (Suno) Idea Extender — I throw it raw ideas, it expands them and produces 2 ready-to-paste briefs (one for Major Dev, one for Senior Dev) Doing a project rn where I teach kid how to use Ai and how to learn with Ai. If anyone has tried something similar, I'd love to know: - How do you handle the orchestrator going down? - Do you let agents talk peer-to-peer, or always through a manager? - How do you split work between a "lead" agent and "execution" agents? Happy to share the protocol files if people are interested. submitted by /u/KamomiIIe [link] [comments]
View originalI open-sourced 59 Claude Skills covering the full website lifecycle (brand, design, content, SEO, dev, ops, growth)
Spent the last few weeks codifying how I work with Claude into a reusable library. Sharing because it might save someone else the same effort. What it is: 59 skills covering the full lifecycle of building, launching, running, and growing a website. 13 categories: brand discovery, creative briefs, IA, content strategy, brand identity, design systems, content/copy, SEO (foundation + audit suite), product specs, dev (code review, components, accessibility, performance), QA, ops (launch, incident response, monitoring, security), growth, research, and a meta-skill that teaches you to write your own. What's interesting (vs. just listing skills): Uniform structure across every skill: when to use, when NOT to use, required inputs, the framework, the workflow, failure patterns, output format, references. The "when NOT to use" sections were where most of my best thinking ended up. Stack-agnostic on purpose. I started writing them tied to Next.js + Supabase, then realized the skills got way more useful when I forced myself to write them so they'd work on WordPress, Shopify, Webflow, plain HTML, anything. The constraint forced the abstractions to be real. The SEO audit suite (7 skills) is built around the Ahrefs MCP. It's the one place I broke my "stack-agnostic" rule because it's so much more useful with structured data behind it. The orchestration skill chains the others (backlink, keyword gap, content gap, traffic diagnosis, site health, rank tracking) into a complete audit run. CI lint validates structure on every contribution. Em dashes, broken refs, frontmatter validity, missing references, mismatched catalog counts. Catches drift before merge. There's a meta-skill (skill-creation-walkthrough) that codifies how I write skills. The thing that took me longest to articulate was the skill description. Getting the trigger phrases right is the difference between a skill that fires reliably and a skill Claude ignores. The honest test I used: would these skills survive me losing access to my own setup tomorrow? If a stranger could clone the repo and ship the same quality of output, the work earned its place. Otherwise it was just my tacit knowledge in a folder. Cut a lot during that pass. MIT licensed. github.com/rampstackco/claude-skills Happy to answer questions about specific skills, the structure decisions, or what I cut and why. submitted by /u/DriverReady965 [link] [comments]
View originalCan I replace Cursor with Claude Desktop
I built a website using Cursor, front end is just html, CSS, and JavaScript and the backend is Supabase. I generate the code using chat, then read and understand the code. I use Cursor to write most of the SQL as well, though I have rudimentary knowledge of SQL. I use the $20 plan on Cursor and keep it on Auto so as not to go over. Despite skills, MCPs, rules and getting better at writing prompts, I still find Cursor frustrating, especially with UI but also with Auth edge functions. I also find the new associating with Musk untenable. I tend to code about 5 hours on Friday and 7 on Sat & Sun, sometimes for a 2-3 hours on the other evenings. I've used Opus and Sonnet to get me out of trouble sometimes through MagicAI (API) so I know how expensive it is. Will I be able to use the $20 plan on Claude Desktop? Would you please explain the 5 hour window and weekly limit? Cursor seems to be limited as far as it's permissions on my desktop. It stays inside my website folders and pays attention to cursor.ignore. If I don't use Claude Co-worker, will I be able to have similar security? Thanks for your knowledge. submitted by /u/SoftandSpicy [link] [comments]
View originalRepository Audit Available
Deep analysis of supabase/supabase — architecture, costs, security, dependencies & more
Yes, Supabase offers a free tier. Pricing found: $10/mo, $0.00325, $0.125, $0.09, $0.03
Key features include: AI Integrations, Analytics Buckets (with Iceberg), Auth Hooks, Authorization via Row Level Security, Auto-generated GraphQL API via pg_graphql, Auto-generated REST API via PostgREST, Automatic Embeddings, Branching.
Supabase is commonly used for: Building scalable web applications with real-time updates, Creating AI applications that require rapid database setup, Implementing user authentication systems with Supabase Auth, Developing mobile applications using Flutter with Supabase as the backend, Prototyping MVPs for startups in a short timeframe, Integrating Supabase Edge Functions for serverless API solutions.
Supabase integrates with: React, React Router, Flutter, Claude AI, PostgREST, pg_graphql, Iceberg, Various CI/CD tools for deployment automation.
Based on user reviews and social mentions, the most common pain points are: token cost.
Harrison Chase
CEO at LangChain
1 mention

Getting Started with Supabase Auth
Mar 31, 2026
Based on 68 social mentions analyzed, 19% of sentiment is positive, 79% neutral, and 1% negative.