Splash Music is making music more interactive than ever. With the biggest music stage on Roblox and cutting-edge creative tools, we’re redefining how
Splash is praised for its intuitive interface and powerful features, making it a strong choice for creative and marketing professionals. Users appreciate its ease of use and ability to handle complex tasks efficiently, but there are complaints about occasional bugs and the need for more robust customer support. The pricing is generally seen as fair, providing good value for the extensive functionalities offered. Overall, Splash maintains a positive reputation for delivering a high-quality user experience.
Mentions (30d)
4
Reviews
0
Platforms
3
Sentiment
10%
1 positive
Splash is praised for its intuitive interface and powerful features, making it a strong choice for creative and marketing professionals. Users appreciate its ease of use and ability to handle complex tasks efficiently, but there are complaints about occasional bugs and the need for more robust customer support. The pricing is generally seen as fair, providing good value for the extensive functionalities offered. Overall, Splash maintains a positive reputation for delivering a high-quality user experience.
Features
Use Cases
Industry
information technology & services
Employees
180
Funding Stage
Series A
Total Funding
$20.2M
Trump’s $1.5 Trillion “Dream Military”
 Image by Diego González. What constitutes national security and how is it best achieved? Does massive military spending really make a country more secure, and what perils to democracy and liberty are posed by vast military establishments? Questions like those are rarely addressed in honest ways these days in America. Instead, the Trump administration favors preparations for war and more war, fueled by potentially enormous increases in military spending that are dishonestly framed as “[recapitalizations](https://theintercept.com/2025/12/08/air-force-hegseth-ken-wilsbach-nuclear-weapons/)” of America’s security and safety. Such framing makes Pete Hegseth, America’s self-styled “secretary of war,” seem almost refreshing in his embrace of a [warrior ethos](https://www.businessinsider.com/hegseths-warrior-ethos-speech-now-mandatory-viewing-for-military-2025-10). Republican Senator Lindsey Graham is another “warrior” who [cheers for conflict](https://www.foxnews.com/politics/graham-suggests-trump-help-iran-protesters-military-cyber-psychological-attacks-against-regime), whether with Venezuela, Iran, or even — yes! — Russia. Such [macho men](https://bracingviews.com/2016/08/03/too-many-troops-have-died-in-the-name-of-big-boy-pants-2/) revel in what they believe is this country’s divine mission to dominate the world. Tragically, at the moment, unapologetic warmongers like Hegseth and Graham are winning the political and cultural battle here in America. Of course, U.S. warmongering is anything but new, as is a belief in global dominance through high military spending. Way back in 1983, as a college student, I worked on a project that critiqued President Ronald Reagan’s “defense” buildup and his embrace of pie-in-the-sky concepts like the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), better known as “Star Wars.” Never did I imagine that, more than 40 years later, another Republican president would again come to embrace SDI (freshly rebranded as “[Golden Dome](https://jacobin.com/2025/11/trump-golden-dome-nuclear-defense)”) and ever-more massive military spending, especially since the Soviet Union, America’s superpower rival in Reagan’s time, ceased to exist 35 years ago. Amazingly, Trump even wants to bring back naval battleships, as Reagan briefly did (though he didn’t have the temerity to call for a new class of ships to be named after himself). It’ll be a “[golden fleet](https://breakingdefense.com/2026/01/first-trump-class-battleship-could-cost-over-20-billion-cbo/),” says Trump. What gives? For much of my life, I’ve tried to answer that very question. Soon after retiring from the U.S. Air Force, I started writing for *TomDispatch*, penning my first article there in 2007, asking Americans to [save the military](https://tomdispatch.com/astore-on-a-military-bemedaled-bothered-and-beleaguered/) from itself and especially from its “surge” illusions in the Iraq War. Tom Engelhardt and I, as well as Andrew Bacevich, Michael Klare, and [Bill Hartung](https://tomdispatch.com/venezuela-the-revival-of-regime-change/), among others, have spilled much ink (symbolically speaking in this online era) at *TomDispatch* urging that America’s military-industrial complex be reined in and reformed. Trump’s recent advocacy of a “[dream military](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-proposes-massive-increase-in-2027-defense-spending-to-1-5-trillion-to-build-dream-military)” with a proposed budget of $1.5 trillion in 2027 (half a trillion dollars larger than the present Pentagon budget) was backed by places like the [editorial board of the *Washington Post*](https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/01/14/trump-defense-spending-trillion/), which just shows how frustratingly ineffectual our efforts have been. How discouraging, and again, what gives? Sometimes (probably too often), I seek sanctuary from the hell we’re living through in glib phrases that mask my despair. So, I’ll write something like: *America isn’t a shining city on a hill, it’s a bristling fortress in a* [*valley of death*](https://bracingviews.substack.com/p/tis-the-season-for-war); or, *At the Pentagon, nothing succeeds like failure*, a reference to [eight failed audits](https://www.reuters.com/world/us/pentagon-fails-eighth-audit-targets-2028-pass-pentagon-says-2025-12-19/) in a row (part of a [30-year pattern](https://www.stephensemler.com/p/house-boosts-military-budget-as-pentagon) of financial finagling) that accompanied disastrous wars in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere. Such phrases, no matter how clever I thought they were, made absolutely no impression when it came to slowing the growth of militarism in America. In essence, I’ve been bringing the online equivalent of a fountain pen to a gun fight, which has proved to be anything but a recipe for success. In America, nothing — and I
View originalClaude Desktop launches (process visible) but window never appears on Windows 11 — Workaround with --disable-gpu but need a permanent solution
TL;DR: Claude Desktop process runs but window never appears. The cause I could find was GPU subprocess crashing silently. --disable-gpu flag runs Claude normally. Looking for a permanent solution and whether a GPU driver update is actually the right fix. Thanks in advance. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hey Everyone, Long post but I want to be detailed so others hitting the same wall can find this. I spent a few hours troubleshooting why Claude Desktop refused to show its window and finally got it running but the fix feels like a workaround, not a real solution. Looking for anyone who's hit this and found a proper fix. Environment OS: Windows 11 24H2 (Build 26100) Claude Desktop version: 1.3883.0.0 Security software: Acronis Cyber Protect The Problem Claude Desktop simply would not show its interface. Clicking the icon or Start menu entry — nothing. No window, no splash screen, no error message. Completely silent failure. What made it confusing is that the process was actually running. In Process Explorer (Sysinternals) you could see one parent claude.exe and two child claude.exe processes sitting there consuming memory. The app was alive, just... windowless. No UI ever appeared no matter how long you waited. Troubleshooting Steps Taken Step 1 — Process Explorer + Minidump I captured a full minidump via Process Explorer and analyzed it. Parsing the module list from the dump revealed something immediately suspicious: three Acronis DeviceLock DLLs were injected into the Claude process: DLForeignProcHlp_x64.dll — Acronis's "Foreign Process Helper," designed specifically to inject into third-party processes DLDrvUserMode64.dll — DeviceLock user-mode driver component FreeImage_x64.dll — screen capture library used by the DLP module The injected driver was hooking critical Windows/NT APIs including ZwMapViewOfSection, ProtectVirtualMemory, LoadLibraryExW, and ZwCreateFile — APIs that Electron's V8 engine uses constantly for JIT compilation. Classic DLP-vs-Electron conflict. Step 2 — Disabled Acronis Completely + Reinstalled Claude Disabled all Acronis services entirely and did a clean reinstall of Claude Desktop to the latest version (1.3883.0.0). Still no window. Different problem now, the Acronis injection was gone, but Claude still wouldn't show its UI. Step 3 — Checked Logs Navigated to the Windows Store app's isolated AppData container: %LOCALAPPDATA%\Packages\Claude_pzs8sxrjxfjjc\ Found the logs folder but it was completely empty. This means Claude was crashing before its own logging system even initialized. Step 4 — Checked Event Viewer Queried Application log for Event ID 1000 (application crash). Nothing conclusive pointing to a specific faulting module in the new version. Step 5 — Tested Launch Flags Tried launching directly from PowerShell with --no-sandbox — no change. Tried with --disable-gpu: & "C:\Program Files\WindowsApps\Claude_1.3883.0.0_x64__pzs8sxrjxfjjc\app\claude.exe" --disable-gpu Window appeared immediately. App is fully functional. Questions for the Community Has anyone else hit this exact symptom — process running, no window, fixed by --disable-gpu? What was your root cause? Is there a way to permanently set launch flags for Claude Desktop's Windows Store version without using a custom batch file? Something like a flags config file the app reads on startup? For those who resolved it properly (not just via --disable-gpu): was it a GPU driver update that fixed it, or something else entirely? Anyone know if Claude Desktop has any built-in GPU/hardware acceleration toggle in its settings that doesn't require a command line flag? Side question: has anyone else found Acronis Cyber Protect's DeviceLock component injecting into Claude and causing crashes? We have no DLP policies configured — the injection is happening by default. Curious if this is affecting others in corporate environments. submitted by /u/Sea-Cycle-2747 [link] [comments]
View originalGenuinely curious if there are AI Wireframing tools already available ...
I had this through for a while, and I wonder if there's any free product like this already... https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/56801a7c-c173-4cf8-a4e1-a0f5175d1858 Wireframing tool for prototyping apps... As designer, after spending some time trying to vibe code / code an app from scratch, I felt the new approach of going from "needs" directly into "code prototypes" helps me to get something working very quickly, but iterating from that prototype is painful. In my workflow, I wish to be able to define the bird-eye view of an end-to-end product Journey first, before spending more time / tokens on visuals like what we have on Figma / Google Stitch / Lovable, and so on. I wonder is there currently any AI lofi-wireframing tools available, that we could simply clarify on the end-to-end UX flow first? best is that once the scope is clear, I could just share a design token library, then it will be able to hand over to agent to build. Ideally workflow: 1. Conversation to create a Product Requirement 2. Enough context -> creates a mini-wireframe like this 3. Highlight / select / and chat through the end-to-end requirement in black and white 4. Clarify on the use-case and edge cases first. 5. After it is done, take it forward to screen design ( you can have 5 visual variation of the same Home Screen but please keep the agreed upon AI as-is and don't change it ) 6. Generate coded prototype and so on ... Why: Mini-wireframe like these felt faster, likely to burn significantly less tokens to drive the conversation before getting into UI. submitted by /u/Jealous_Incident7978 [link] [comments]
View originalWhen claude code fails, I ask it to write a short paragraph on the issue. Most of the times it finds correct solutions before finishing the writing.
Few days ago claude code was not working well, became very dumb and wasting tokens. Then thaught of summarising the issue so that I can paste issue in other models. So I asked claude to write short paragraph on the issue and what all we already tried so far. While writing the paragraph it accidentally found the solution, fixed it. It worked. I keep doing it, 6 out of 10 times it works, saves me peace and tokens. edit: If anyone wonder what happens to rest of the 4 cases, here it is : I actually paste the issue paragraph to chatgpt and copy its solution > paste it back to to claude code, here how it looks : https://preview.redd.it/g2geqql570vg1.png?width=892&format=png&auto=webp&s=aaf3d3930f8fc1bed582e2aa40cb0d38ec3b3c23 Still win win!! submitted by /u/AssumptionAcceptable [link] [comments]
View originalSo apparently you can use a hook to print stuff on top of every Claude Code response
While I was playing with hooks, Claude Code happened to add a status line to show some data. Since there is no build-in statusLine setting in the VS Code extension, it found its own workaround. UserPromptSubmit hooks can return additionalContext via hookSpecificOutput. Claude renders whatever you put in there as GitHub-flavored markdown at the top of every response. You can even add a splash screen. The gist is a ~20-line bash script. It grabs git branch --show-current and date, formats a one-liner, outputs JSON: json {"hookSpecificOutput":{"hookEventName":"UserPromptSubmit","additionalContext":"..."}} Note: additionalContext gets injected as a system-level reminder, same layer as CLAUDE.md. It doesn't just print text, it can influence responses. Print a different timezone and Claude will assume you're in that region. Be careful not to inject misleading context. Gist: https://gist.github.com/jbmoutout/ff16d9445c600b8663b1954df27b7d03 submitted by /u/jbmoutout [link] [comments]
View originalTrump’s $1.5 Trillion “Dream Military”
 Image by Diego González. What constitutes national security and how is it best achieved? Does massive military spending really make a country more secure, and what perils to democracy and liberty are posed by vast military establishments? Questions like those are rarely addressed in honest ways these days in America. Instead, the Trump administration favors preparations for war and more war, fueled by potentially enormous increases in military spending that are dishonestly framed as “[recapitalizations](https://theintercept.com/2025/12/08/air-force-hegseth-ken-wilsbach-nuclear-weapons/)” of America’s security and safety. Such framing makes Pete Hegseth, America’s self-styled “secretary of war,” seem almost refreshing in his embrace of a [warrior ethos](https://www.businessinsider.com/hegseths-warrior-ethos-speech-now-mandatory-viewing-for-military-2025-10). Republican Senator Lindsey Graham is another “warrior” who [cheers for conflict](https://www.foxnews.com/politics/graham-suggests-trump-help-iran-protesters-military-cyber-psychological-attacks-against-regime), whether with Venezuela, Iran, or even — yes! — Russia. Such [macho men](https://bracingviews.com/2016/08/03/too-many-troops-have-died-in-the-name-of-big-boy-pants-2/) revel in what they believe is this country’s divine mission to dominate the world. Tragically, at the moment, unapologetic warmongers like Hegseth and Graham are winning the political and cultural battle here in America. Of course, U.S. warmongering is anything but new, as is a belief in global dominance through high military spending. Way back in 1983, as a college student, I worked on a project that critiqued President Ronald Reagan’s “defense” buildup and his embrace of pie-in-the-sky concepts like the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), better known as “Star Wars.” Never did I imagine that, more than 40 years later, another Republican president would again come to embrace SDI (freshly rebranded as “[Golden Dome](https://jacobin.com/2025/11/trump-golden-dome-nuclear-defense)”) and ever-more massive military spending, especially since the Soviet Union, America’s superpower rival in Reagan’s time, ceased to exist 35 years ago. Amazingly, Trump even wants to bring back naval battleships, as Reagan briefly did (though he didn’t have the temerity to call for a new class of ships to be named after himself). It’ll be a “[golden fleet](https://breakingdefense.com/2026/01/first-trump-class-battleship-could-cost-over-20-billion-cbo/),” says Trump. What gives? For much of my life, I’ve tried to answer that very question. Soon after retiring from the U.S. Air Force, I started writing for *TomDispatch*, penning my first article there in 2007, asking Americans to [save the military](https://tomdispatch.com/astore-on-a-military-bemedaled-bothered-and-beleaguered/) from itself and especially from its “surge” illusions in the Iraq War. Tom Engelhardt and I, as well as Andrew Bacevich, Michael Klare, and [Bill Hartung](https://tomdispatch.com/venezuela-the-revival-of-regime-change/), among others, have spilled much ink (symbolically speaking in this online era) at *TomDispatch* urging that America’s military-industrial complex be reined in and reformed. Trump’s recent advocacy of a “[dream military](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-proposes-massive-increase-in-2027-defense-spending-to-1-5-trillion-to-build-dream-military)” with a proposed budget of $1.5 trillion in 2027 (half a trillion dollars larger than the present Pentagon budget) was backed by places like the [editorial board of the *Washington Post*](https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/01/14/trump-defense-spending-trillion/), which just shows how frustratingly ineffectual our efforts have been. How discouraging, and again, what gives? Sometimes (probably too often), I seek sanctuary from the hell we’re living through in glib phrases that mask my despair. So, I’ll write something like: *America isn’t a shining city on a hill, it’s a bristling fortress in a* [*valley of death*](https://bracingviews.substack.com/p/tis-the-season-for-war); or, *At the Pentagon, nothing succeeds like failure*, a reference to [eight failed audits](https://www.reuters.com/world/us/pentagon-fails-eighth-audit-targets-2028-pass-pentagon-says-2025-12-19/) in a row (part of a [30-year pattern](https://www.stephensemler.com/p/house-boosts-military-budget-as-pentagon) of financial finagling) that accompanied disastrous wars in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere. Such phrases, no matter how clever I thought they were, made absolutely no impression when it came to slowing the growth of militarism in America. In essence, I’ve been bringing the online equivalent of a fountain pen to a gun fight, which has proved to be anything but a recipe for success. In America, nothing — and I
View originalSplash uses a tiered pricing model. Visit their website for current pricing details.
Key features include: Explore more, Splash App, Splash on Roblox, JUMP IN THE MIX - WEMIX IT!, Investors, Technology.
Splash is commonly used for: Creating personalized music tracks for users, Generating background music for content creators, Facilitating music creation for game developers, Providing music for advertising campaigns, Enabling music collaboration among artists, Offering music customization for events.
Splash integrates with: Roblox, YouTube, Twitch, Spotify, Apple Music, SoundCloud, Discord, Facebook.
Based on user reviews and social mentions, the most common pain points are: $500 bill.
Vinod Khosla
Founder at Khosla Ventures
1 mention
Morning Bird or Night Owl? #wemix #wemixed #makemusic #pickyourside #morningperson #nightowl
Mar 13, 2026
