Netlify AI

Netlify AI AI

Netlify AI AI

Netlify AI AI

Netlify AI AI

Netlify AI AI

Netlify AI AI

Netlify AI AI

Netlify AI AI

Netlify AI AI

Netlify AI AI

Built an MCP for claude code that turns ticket-mentions into PRs with browser QA (and what I learned along the way)

notesasm is an MCP server you add to claude code. you mention a fix mid-flow ("make a ticket on notesasm: fix the regex for quoted emails") and it files the ticket. later, on your schedule, an autonomous agent picks the ticket up, writes the fix, runs real-browser QA against your preview deploy, and opens a PR with screenshots. closed alpha, free during it. demo + signup: notesasm.com the pain it solves (3 separate ones, actually): claude code is fast enough now that shipping isn't the bottleneck anymore. when you're deep in a feature and notice "the regex misses RFC-quoted local parts" or "the footer copy is wrong on mobile", you'd never break flow to open jira/linear or even write it down anywhere. so the idea goes nowhere. multiply by a year and your repo has invisible debt nobody's tracking. claude code helps while you're at the keyboard. it doesn't help while you sleep. your repo doesn't move overnight unless you stayed up to push it. for solo founders or small teams, that means losing 8 hours a day where you could be shipping if you had a way to delegate work to your own agent. and even if you do have something pushing code for you overnight, you lose context with AI-generated PRs and they usually need visual review. claude writes code that compiles and tests pass, but the actual rendered output might be subtly broken (or super broken lol). reviewing those visually is tedious and a lot of teams skip it, then ship regressions. how it works: you add the MCP server: claude mcp add notesasm --scope user --transport http -H "Authorization: Bearer ". BYOK style, the token comes from your dashboard. zero local install beyond the one command. then in any claude code session you can say "make a ticket on notesasm for this" (based on your conversation) and it just files it. the MCP server is HTTP-transport (not stdio), runs in the cloud, hits a fastapi backend that stores the ticket in postgres against your workspace. later (your schedule, your spend cap), a worker process picks up queued tickets. for each one: clones your repo with a github app installation token (commits look like asmnotes[bot], a verified author. bypasses vercel/netlify deploy protection that rejects unknown-team-member commits.) runs the claude agent sdk with your ticket body as the prompt. defaults to sonnet 4.6, opus 4.7 for hard tickets the user marks explicitly. agent reads the codebase, makes the edits, commits, pushes a branch, opens a PR via the github API. waits for your preview deploy to land. vercel polled by default, configurable probe URL for split frontend/backend setups like vercel + railway. QA agent drives a real chrome session on browserbase against the preview. stealth profile with residential proxies. takes before/after screenshots. verifies your acceptance criteria against the rendered output. if QA fails, the report feeds back into the build agent for up to 3 retry iterations before parking the ticket. final: PR with QA screenshots in the description, ready to merge. stack: - backend: fastapi + asyncpg + railway - frontend: vanilla html/js, no build step, vercel - agents: claude agent sdk (build), claude + browserbase (QA) - auth: clerk - email: resend (welcome, invite, feedback) - mcp transport: http (cloud-hosted, no local install) things i learned building it that other claude code folks might care about: - the build agent loves to spawn subagents via the Task tool. disable it explicitly in the system prompt or you get 4-minute hangs the SDK doesn't surface as errors. - browserbase sessions default to a ~5-min timeout. if your QA wall budget is anywhere near that, set the session lifetime explicitly to 1800s on session create (the timeout field). otherwise you get random "410 Gone" mid-run. - don't rely on the SDK's wall budget alone. add a per-message timeout (90s works) so a hung tool call doesn't silently burn your whole budget. - claude code's default mcp scope is per-cwd. always tell users `--scope user` in your install instructions, otherwise the MCP works in one repo and silently doesn't in others. - ResultMessage emissions happen multiple times per job if you have iteration loops (build + QA + qa-fix). sum them all when computing per-job cost, not just the last one. what's next: closed alpha is open. would love ~30 active users to try it out, all free during it. paid plans later this year with a permanent discount for alpha users. happy to answer anything about the MCP design, the QA verification loop, cost tracking, the agent-sdk integration, or anything else. demo + signup: notesasm.com submitted by /u/FormExtension7920 [link] [comments]

Mobile App with Clade

Just a quick question. Is building a mobile app like this actually a legit approach? I recently came across someone building fairly complex web apps, for example a geo quiz with full database integration, using this workflow: He generates all the HTML, CSS and JS through Claude (the AI), deploys it to Netlify, connects a database like Supabase or Firebase, and then uses "Add to Homescreen" so it looks and feels like a native mobile app. No framework, no GitHub repo, no CI/CD, no app store. And honestly it works. The apps are functional and pretty complex. So my questions are: Is this a legit long-term approach or will it break at some point when it comes to scaling, maintenance, payments etc.? Does anyone know a successful product built this way, just AI generated frontend code hosted on Netlify plus a backend as a service? At what point do you actually need a proper repo, a framework and a native app? For someone trying to ship fast and validate ideas, is this actually the smartest approach right now? I've been building things the proper way and now I'm questioning if I'm overcomplicating it. submitted by /u/yoloswaghipsterxx [link] [comments]

Used Claude to build my first app from scratch — honest breakdown of the process

I want to share an honest account of using Claude to build a real software product because most posts about AI-assisted development are either too vague or too polished to be useful. I built this app because my executive director asked me to find a device, calendar of any kind, that can show her the full year on the screen where our Outlook app could not. I purchased and $800 Cozyla device that we returned that could not do it. What I built Yearview — a web-based annual planning board that shows all 12 months on one screen. Color-coded categories, calendar import from Google or Outlook, AI-powered insights and pattern detection, natural language Q&A, and three professional PDF export formats. No account required, no subscription, data stays on your device. Free to try at yearviewapp.com — no account, no email, nothing required. What Claude actually helped with The app: Built the entire HTML/CSS/JavaScript single-file application Designed the UI — layout, color system, typography, components Built the import system, AI Insights page, and three export formats Built the license key validation system using Netlify serverless functions and JSONBin Built automated email delivery via Resend API Mobile responsive CSS and bug fixes throughout The business side: Designed the SVG logo system Wrote all marketing copy and built the full marketing site Researched and assessed competitors Set up Netlify deployment, DNS configuration, and Gumroad product listing Wrote the Product Hunt launch copy and social media posts What Claude did NOT do This matters as much as what it did: It did not have the idea — I noticed a real problem and decided to solve it It did not make product decisions — I decided what to build, what to charge, who to target It did not work autonomously — every session was directed by me with specific goals It did not always get it right — bugs and wrong approaches needed multiple iterations The relationship felt like working with a capable collaborator who never got tired and always had time to explain why something worked the way it did. The honest learning curve The most useful skill I developed was giving Claude the right context. Early sessions were less productive because I was not specific enough. Learning to describe not just what I wanted but why and what the constraints were made a significant difference in output quality. Also — Claude cannot test things in a real browser. I did all the testing myself and brought back what I found. That back and forth was the core of the development loop. Where it is now Yearview launched on Product Hunt last week. It is live and taking real purchases. I could not have built it without Claude — not because the skills were beyond me given enough time, but because the combination of technical build, design, copy, and business setup would have taken a year working alone. With Claude it took weeks. One of my biggest trouble is in the pricing. Trying to find a sweet spot for the work that I did and how it can be truly helpful and not undersell it cheaply. I think the benefit of the app is solid. I'll be updating with new feature in another build that Claude will assist with. Happy to answer questions about the process or prompting approach. https://preview.redd.it/s9a9lmsoa0vg1.png?width=717&format=png&auto=webp&s=5f1f68fe0062e879de40d9e65ef6378785e3f68f https://preview.redd.it/qmtx5osoa0vg1.png?width=1960&format=png&auto=webp&s=9213164af32314c561e924e96145823edc95b111 https://preview.redd.it/0yup3msoa0vg1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=241b855dc3bd6a7b9064ddb063531476187f7f97 https://preview.redd.it/qgcqhmsoa0vg1.png?width=1600&format=png&auto=webp&s=d3257759090e77503d91ff9649cbfb34a93abe20 https://preview.redd.it/gcqhylsoa0vg1.png?width=1600&format=png&auto=webp&s=816ec2dfb9752733cc707be7190d1400f8df69cf submitted by /u/lewmarks [link] [comments]

Showcase: A project to deploy web apps with Claude and higher-level abstractions

I have used Heroku, Railway, Vercel, and Netlify in the past. It was always too many clicks for me. Nowadays, I just ask Claude Code to get the job done and I review its plan. No more clicks. To get started, create a root directory with the following content: Your website source code (I use Astro in this example but it can work with any web framework). Clone https://github.com/amiorin/big-config Clone https://github.com/amiorin/once The three glue files (Dockerfile, Caddyfile, and GitHub Action) Set Claude Code to Opus 4.6 Max effort with planning and start with this prompt: "Adapt my Astro project to create a GHCR Docker image and update the Once project to use this container on a Hetzner VPS." My theory is that the future of DevOps is not just agentic where we ask an AI to write 500 lines of Terraform every time but rather AI that combines battle-tested abstractions for deployment. It works in DevOps because something similar happened in Frontend too. Agents didn't replace React, they built on top of it. This approach reduces token usage, lowers the risk of hallucinations, and provides safe abstractions that can be used by non-experts because they are reviewed by experts. This is just the beginning because I expect marketing, finance, and other departments to eventually deploy internal applications without needing a Software Engineer to develop them or a DevOps specialist to deploy them. submitted by /u/amiorin [link] [comments]

I vibe coded a free password generator that gets stronger by using a DeLorean

Hi everyone, Obsessed with Claude Code the past few weeks. I just finished vibe coding v1 of my fist tool. I built this with Claude Code. PopcornPasswords.com A free to try, free forever password generator tool, with a movies twist. Best on a laptop/computer browser. I built this entire thing using AI (Claude free and then paid version Opus 4.6). I also used Netlify to host and codesandbox to test. A lot of trial and error. I would tell Claude what to build, it created it as a HTML + CSS index.html, which I copied the code and pasted it into codesandbox platform to review and test in a browser. I kept coming back to ClaudeAI with errors to fix. when i was stuck on the free version, i paid the parter plan and had less constraints. all done over a few days/nghts chipping away an hour or so here and there. I would ask it too if there are any problems, what does it recommend fixing, which was a great help. It's movies based. it works best on a browser. It includes movie themes, like with BTTF where you use the DeLorean to increaase the length of a password. Quotes from the movies and the sliders are upgraded from the mundane. Ive added themes for Back to the Future, Goonies, Independence Day (you'll love using the beam to explode the building hahaha), Top Gun, Spinal Tap (the volume goes to 11!). It makes passwords just a touch more fun, and I will keep it forever free. Was meant to be a tool just for me, but I decided to make it for public use. There's dark and light modes. If you don't like fun, or scared your boss will spot you over your shoulder using it at work, you can click the suitcase and go into "office mode". This is my first ever live app, so please be gentle hahahha but I really want to know what you think of the concept. Cheers! submitted by /u/ChampionStrange7719 [link] [comments]

WordPress? I think I screwed up on my core website-building approach, with Claude.

I'm in my first big web project with Claude and part of it I love - it's my best work yet and I have changed the direction and sales of several companies and this will be no exception. But it taking months and months. I have done many sites but am mostly a marketer, not a coder. The issue is I'm mostly a WordPress builder. My sites are also long form with a ton of content as my secret sauce. I do all the writing and content work and implement it. One stop marketing and sales shop. Claude is crushing it with most of it. I expect the revenue of this company to double in 1-2 years when I am done which I have done several times before. So we really are using websites and internet to its best use case. But again, it's taking months. I have to review most of the code, and am having to closely review all of Claude's marketing content mostly, some CSS, and mostly issues with it constantly putting the wrong photos in the wrong place, and systematically building it's own dependence by structure into the website building, and lots of misreads of difficult nuanced engineering items in a wild environment. Photo for example. The website is a technical subject including buoyancy and performance of things like whitewater rafts, so even with deep education I can't get claude to sort and place photos correctly and to fully understand it. Lots of errors. Understandable. It is also MUCH better than ChatGPT which I had to fire after wasting a month or two before realizing all of its output was actually garbage. I then tested ChatGPT about 20 other times and caught it repeatedly lying and more. I and actually view Chat GPT a truly dangerous tool in the amount of misinformation and hallucinations it willing to have. I can't build or maintain this site without Claude and what appears now to be a very manual process. I am dependent on it or a competitor forever and I'm certain something will catch up to Claude. No big deal, I will never not build without AI again. I believe it is the best took out there for this type of work but have only tested Claude and Chat. I am having to hack by pasting custom HTML to retain a bunch of core and all this and the architecture recommended by claude to retain the core WordPress functionality. I designed all this with Claude so some of it is my mistake but I am and need to be nearly 90-100% hands on mostly with content edits (mistakes). I am aware of Netlify that it can have Claude do much more work. What else can I do - what other approaches can I take if I need content rich, light ecommerce or ecommerce functionality, highlighting of products and more? submitted by /u/dieselcruiserhead [link] [comments]

I built an IDE for Claude Code users. The "Antspace" leak just changed everything..

For context: I'm a solo founder. I built Coder1, an IDE specifically designed for Claude Code power users and teams. So when 19-year-old reverse-engineered an unstripped Go binary inside Claude Code Web and found Anthropic is quietly building an entire cloud platform, my first reaction was "oh no." My second reaction was much more interesting. What was found (quick summary): A developer named AprilNEA ran basic Linux tooling (strace, strings, go tool objdump) inside their Claude Code Web session and found: "Antspace" — a completely unannounced PaaS (Platform as a Service) built by Anthropic. Zero public mentions before March 18, 2026. "Baku" — the internal codename for Claude's web app builder. It auto-provisions Supabase databases and deploys to Antspace by default. Not Vercel. BYOC (Bring Your Own Cloud) — an enterprise layer with Kubernetes integration, seven API endpoints, and session orchestration. Anthropic wants your infra contract. The full pipeline: intent → Claude → Baku → Supabase → Antspace → live app. The user never leaves Anthropic's ecosystem. All of this was readable because Anthropic shipped the binary with full debug symbols and private monorepo paths. For a "safety-first" AI lab... that's a choice. Why this matters more than people realize: This isn't about a chatbot getting a deploy button. This is the Amazon AWS playbook. Amazon built cloud infrastructure for their own needs, made it great, then opened it to everyone. Antspace is Claude's internal deployment target today. Tomorrow it's a public PaaS with a built-in user base of everyone who's ever asked Claude to "build me a web app." The vertical integration is complete: - AI layer: Claude understands your intent - Runtime layer: Baku manages your project, runs dev server, handles git - Data layer: Supabase auto-provisioned via MCP (you never even see it) - Hosting layer: Antspace deploys and serves your app - Enterprise layer: BYOC lets companies run it on their own infra You say what you want in English. Everything else happens automatically, on Anthropic's infrastructure. Who should be paying attention: - Vercel/Netlify: If Claude's default deploy target is Antspace, Vercel becomes the optional alternative, not the default. - Replit/Lovable/Bolt: If Claude can generate code, manage projects, provision databases, AND deploy — all inside claude.ai - what's the value prop of a separate AI app builder? - E2B/Railway: Anthropic built their own Firecracker sandbox infrastructure. It's integrated into the model. - Every startup building on Claude's ecosystem: The platform you're building on top of is becoming the platform that competes with you. The silver lining (from someone in the blast radius): After the initial panic, I realized something. Baku/Antspace targets people who want to say "build me a todo app" and never touch code. That's a massive market — but it's not MY market. Power users will hit Baku's limitations within days. No real git control. No custom MCP servers. No team collaboration. No local file access. No IDE features. They'll need somewhere to graduate to. Anthropic going vertical actually validates the market and grows the funnel. More people using Claude → more people outgrowing the chat interface → more people needing real developer tools. But the window is narrowing. Fast. Discussion: - How do you feel about your AI provider also becoming your cloud provider, database provider, and hosting provider? - For those building products in the Claude ecosystem: does this change your strategy? - The BYOC enterprise play seems like the real long-term move. Thoughts? Original research by AprilNEA: https://aprilnea.me/en/blog/reverse-engineering-claude-code-antspace submitted by /u/oscarsergioo61 [link] [comments]

From using Claude as a basic chatbot to building a website with it, a few questions from a complete beginner

So I’ve been seeing a ton of Instagram reels about Claude lately and what it’s capable of. I’ve had the free version for a while but was just using it like a regular AI chatbox — basically ChatGPT. Had no idea what it could actually do. Long story short, I want to build a proper website using Claude. Zero coding knowledge on my end — no HTML, no CSS, nothing. Here’s my situation: I already have a domain on GoDaddy connected to a Google Sites website. The problem is no matter how much I edit it, it always comes out looking dull and unattractive. Google Sites has its limits. So I’m thinking of having Claude generate a website and connecting my existing domain to it instead. My questions: 1. Is Netlify the standard way to host Claude-generated websites? Claude told me the workflow is — tell Claude what to change, it generates updated code, drag and drop onto Netlify, done. Is this actually how people use it? 2. For anyone who has done this — how easy is it really to manage compared to Google Sites? 3. Any tips for a complete beginner going from Google Sites to a Claude-built site? Would appreciate any advice from people who’ve actually done this! submitted by /u/Vast_Poetry_50 [link] [comments]