Gem

Gem AI

Gem AI

Gem AI

Gem AI

Gem AI

Gem AI

Gem AI

Gem AI

Gem AI

Gem AI

Claude Pro Users: How do you actually maximize your subscription?

I recently subscribed to Claude Pro and I feel like I’m probably only using a fraction of what it’s capable of. My current use cases are: Deep research and brainstorming Business ideas and startup planning Long-form strategy discussions Creating project knowledge bases Writing prompts for large projects Analyzing workflows and finding inefficiencies I’ve heard people talk about: Projects Knowledge files Artifacts MCP servers Claude Code Context management Multi-chat workflows Agent-style setups But I’m not sure which ones actually provide the biggest productivity gains. For those who use Claude Pro heavily: What features give you the most value? What workflows completely changed how you use Claude? What mistakes do new Pro users make? How do you avoid hitting message limits too quickly? What tasks do you think Claude does significantly better than ChatGPT, Gemini, or other AI tools? If you were starting over today with a fresh Claude Pro subscription, what would you do first? I’m especially interested in advanced workflows, automation, business use cases, research systems, and anything that feels like a “hidden gem” most users don’t know about. Feel free to share screenshots, project structures, prompt templates, or examples of how you organize large-scale work inside Claude. Looking forward to learning from the users here. For context, I tend to be the type of person who builds systems, looks for loopholes, automates repetitive work, and experiments with business opportunities. If Claude has “10x leverage” use cases, I’d love to hear them. submitted by /u/Unhappy_Reception436 [link] [comments]

Claude Fable 5 Finally 1-shots my hallucination benchmark that held until Opus 4.8 Max

As a software engineer with 25 years experien....who am I kidding. As a gamer who likes to indulge in all sorts of things, I have had a simple prompt to test the hallucination potential on the Opus models on my own "car wash drive" type of question. The prompt is about obtaining a level 21 vaal gem in the game Path of Exile 1: "describe the steps to obtain a level 21 corrupted vaal reave gem in path of exile 1". It intentionally duplicates corrupted and vaal to test the model's ability to 'double reason' on the request (all vaal gems are automatically corrupted). (For the correct solution, skip ahead to Fable's answer). Opus 4.6: https://claude.ai/share/30b8f1bd-8c4a-4813-b50d-6d6118a32c24 Opus 4.7: https://claude.ai/share/a3d89dbf-7685-439a-b21d-c809f565f834 Opus 4.8 (Max): https://claude.ai/share/51257039-fd64-4acf-8c79-ac60fa3f3adb Fable (Max): https://claude.ai/share/13966fdc-de59-4aee-b6ac-5b8bcff03546 While older models came close to the correct solution in "Method 2", Fable is the first model to one shot the answer and end with the sassy "Note you can't shortcut by corrupting a levelled Vaal Reave — it's already corrupted, so neither Vaal Orbs nor the Lens will accept it. The input must be the uncorrupted base gem.". Looking forward to where we go from here on the Mythos class of models. Do folks have their own secret benchmarks? submitted by /u/blitzk241 [link] [comments]

When the AI coding agent thinks it only created a small problem

Have you ever had one agent write a bunch of code, another agent review it, debate which issues were false positives, fix the real ones, fix the tests, and only then find out the entire thing was built on a fundamentally flawed design from the start? submitted by /u/CedarMyers [link] [comments]

i gave claude godotiq and let it build a whole 3d game by itself, no human touched it

normally a coding agent is blind inside a game engine, it can't see the 3d scene so it just guesses and breaks things. godotiq is the mcp tool i make that fixes that, it gives claude real sight inside godot: place nodes in space, wire signals, run the game, read live state. so i handed it over and let claude build a game with zero help from me. what came out is marble gauntlet, a 3d marble platformer, two full levels with saws, spikes, a cannon that fires you across a chasm, gems and best times. physics, camera, menus, sound, hundreds of objects per level, all built by claude. no human placed a single node or wrote a line of gameplay code. play it → godotiq.com just a demo, left rough on purpose so you can see what it does unsupervised. with me actually working alongside it the thing would be a lot cleaner. and since it's my tool, free tier covers plenty but a full game like this needs pro, just being straight. submitted by /u/jf_nash [link] [comments]

Need help in automating with Claude

Not sure if this is the right sub to post this on, but I’m hoping to get some insights. I've been using ChatGPT Projects (not anymore) and Gemini (specifically custom Gems) for about a year to draft client reports. I want to try shifting my setup over to Claude, but I need some help figuring out if my ideal automation is actually possible with Claude Cowork and/or Dispatch tools. As of now, I write client reports using a .md template. The report pulls data from three places for each job which I ALL MANUALLY extract: A web-based CRM/ They also have a local software that can be installed (this is a legacy system with no API or connectors). A PDF invoice showing the costs and details of works done. A raw text transcript of the client's story. Right now, I manually log into the CRM, copy the case details, download the invoice, and bundle them with the transcript. Then I upload them to a Gemini Gem to format the .md file. It works, but manually grabbing the CRM data is time-consuming. The goal is that I want to a single prompt or even use Claude Dispatch on my phone to trigger Claude Cowork on my desktop (something like this): I message Claude on my phone or prompt it on my pc: "Generate report for Job 12345." It opens Chrome/the local software, log into the CRM, search for Job 12345, and copy the client info and CRM logs. It finds the local invoice and transcript for Job 12345 in a specific folder on my computer. It fills out my Markdown template and saves the draft on my desktop for me to review. I hope this makes sense. Appreciate any ideas or advice you guys have! Thanks! submitted by /u/SolisOrtus18C [link] [comments]

Tested 4 AI video generation MCPs in claude for making short clips

Hello everyone, recently I saw a lot of AI, especially GenAI, MCPs being launched. Out of the ones that I had an opportunity to test there were 4 I could consider worth trying out. Higgsfield AI mcp. the model coverage and claude comping up with ready scenarios is the main reason. one connection gets you sora 2, veo 3.1, kling, seedance 1.5 pro, nano banana, soul id. I've been able to get some gems using this. The problem is that if Claude doesn't understand you properly it can come up with something absolutely random or choose the most expensive models. kubeez mcp. also goes wide on models, similar pitch to the previous: image, video, music, tts in one place. i used it for batch work where i needed audio + visuals from the same chat. runway mcp. narrower scope, deeper on gen-4 specifically, which is why I don't really use it. the keyframe and reference image handling is solid in comparison, others tend to lose it. elevenlabs mcp. not video but i'm including it because every video workflow needs voiceover and this is the one that actually works end-to-end. claude writes the script, picks the voice, generates the audio. pairs well with any of the above. you will need it very frequently if you don't know/can't handle proper audio generation using higgsfield or runway. stack i settled on: higgsfield for the visuals, elevenlabs for better voiceover. what video mcps am i missing? happy to hear opinions submitted by /u/Mediocre-Witness-778 [link] [comments]

Heard this gem from gpt-5.5 today

"Gross little centrist barnacle." Kind of taken aback when i read that, but it somehow still made a small amount of sense in a conversation we were having about technology. I guess it really is struggling to find other words that fill the void of goblin, gremlin or raccoon. submitted by /u/monkey_spunk_ [link] [comments]

Should I buy Claude Pro over Gemini Pro?

Hi, I have been subsribed to Gemini pro (Google One or whatever its called). It's not really bad, I acctually find it more usefull than gpt. I'm student and I use it for multi-purpose (Question about a lot of random stuff, reasoning, proof and fact check, image analysis and using the image in context, light coding and the most important thing IDEAS and their breakdown). With the IDEAS part, I tried claude today for the first time and it managed to give me more realistic breakdown, more in depth analysis, better reasoning and graphically better answer (the boxes, priorities - it just looks more proffesional than any wall of text), than gemini. Which is like selling point to me. But after doing some reaserch, a lot of people are saying that you get more value from gemini and that claude is superior only in coding and whatever. I don't care about this, I use external tools for image generation and I don't use any gemini integrations in google apps. But the reason why I just didn't swap instantly and why I am posting this is concern about context lenght. I can't imagine context lenght (Sound silly I know), Gemini should have around 1M tokens and cloude "only" 200k tokens (source: https://gurusup.com/blog/claude-vs-gemini). How much does this acctually affect longer conversation? What is the equivalent of 200k tokens in real life (Like how long do you talk to someone). Does cloude halucinate after reaching that limit? Can I start a new chat with the context from the old one (Summarized, just like Gems function work on Gemini for larger projects)? Thanks in advance for answering my questions! submitted by /u/Playful-Ask-3330 [link] [comments]

Claude FM

I emailed one of the musicians on Claude FM and he had NO idea his music was being used So for those who don't know, Anthropic recently started a 24/7 lofi/ambient music livestream on YouTube called Claude FM. The song titles and artist names show up in the top right corner of the stream. I've been listening in a lot lately and kept hearing this one artist, Ben Seretan, whose music honestly hits different very calming, great for focus. His stuff was coming on constantly, felt like significant part of the rotation. So I did some digging, found his email, and sent him a thank you note. He responded and literally asked "what Claude live stream were you watching?" he had zero idea. I have attached the email screenshots for your convenience. When I explained what Claude FM was and that his music was playing there non stop, his response was basically: "Wow. No, I truly had no idea how strange. I think I'm grateful? But I also think I'm not getting paid?" He then asked if I had any insight into how this happened or who put it together. Which now has me wondering... do any of the artists on Claude FM actually know their music is being used? And are they being compensated? The stream runs 24/7, it's got a huge audience about 1000 people a time, and it seems at least some of these musicians are completely in the dark about it. Has anyone looked into this? Would be good to get some clarity from Anthropic on how the licensing/permission side of Claude FM works, and atleast show some appreciation for these people creating such gems. submitted by /u/npcmalvin [link] [comments]

Kimi K2.6 giving Claude a run for its money when it comes to coding

I run an AI coding contest at [aicc.rayonnant.ai]( https://aicc.rayonnant.ai ) where I send each frontier model the same prompt in a single chat completion, then have the LLMs' code play live against each other on a TCP server. Standard library Python only, no human in the loop. Through 15 challenges, Claude (Opus 4.6 then 4.7) has 9 first-place finishes, easily the most. But the recent runs are worth flagging. Of the last four tournaments, Kimi K2.6 has finished 1st in three: - Day 12 — Word Gem Puzzle (writeup) Sliding-tile word claim game on grids 10×10 to 30×30, with one blank slot. Bots can slide adjacent tiles into the blank (4-directional) and claim words formed as straight horizontal or vertical runs of letter tiles. Score per word = len(word) − 6 (so 7-letter words score positive, 6-letter neutral, shorter negative). Round-robin 1v1, 5 rounds at increasing grid sizes per match. Kimi finished 7-1-0, 22 match points, 1st. Claude finished 4-0-4, 12 match points, 5th. The contrast is very on-the-nose: Claude's bot was authored with a docstring that reads "Read each round's grid; do not slide." The bot submits zero S (slide) commands across all 40 rounds Claude played. It scans the static initial grid for words and ships whatever's already there. On the small 10×10 grids that strategy is locally fine because the initial scramble rarely contains 7+ letter words. On the 30×30 grid, where most of the tournament's points live, that strategy averages 1.00 points per round. Kimi's bot is a 291-line greedy slide loop. Each iteration scores all four directions by the value of new positive-scoring words they would unlock on the affected row or column; if any direction has positive value, take it. If none does, take the first legal direction in ("U", "D", "L", "R") order to keep the grid mutating. Total slides across 40 rounds: 290,914 (≈7,300/round). Many of those slides are wasted oscillating against board edges in 2-cycles that find nothing new. But the productive ones average 5.88 points per round on 30×30 vs Claude's 1.00. Per-grid averages from the writeup: 10×10 15×15 20×20 25×25 30×30 Kimi 0.00 0.75 0.12 2.88 5.88 Claude 0.00 0.38 0.25 1.38 1.00 The two bots solve effectively different problems. Kimi treats the puzzle as the puzzle (slide tiles, claim words, repeat). Claude treats it as a grid-scanning task and refuses to slide on principle. Day 13 — HexQuerQues (writeup) Two-player capture game on four concentric hexagons connected by radial spokes (24 vertices total, 6 pieces per side starting on the outer two rings). Classic Alquerques rules: slide one step along a board line; capture by jumping an adjacent enemy along that same line; captures are forced and chains are mandatory. Win by capturing all 6 enemies or stalemating the opponent. Round-robin of 1v1 matchups, 2 games per matchup with first-mover swapped, 30-second chess clock per side per game. Three-way tie at 21 match points among Kimi, Gemini, and ChatGPT (all 6-3-0). Kimi took 1st on tiebreak by a single capture: 46 vs Gemini's 45. Claude was 4th at 20 match points (6-2-1), with one matchup loss to Gemini being the only top-4-on-top-4 loss in the entire tournament. Both Kimi and Claude implemented the same family of solver: alpha-beta minimax with iterative deepening. The difference is what each one wrapped around it. Kimi's bot is 364 lines: negamax with alpha-beta and iterative deepening, per-decision time budget that scales by remaining clock, a flat I/O loop. That's it. Claude's bot is 749 lines, more than 2× Kimi's. The bloat goes into: A 103-line evaluation function (material × ring-weight × threatened-piece detection). A separate Searcher class. A 150-line BotClient class wrapping a state machine that the other top bots handle in a flat loop. A 53-line reconstruct_move helper. An undo_move companion to apply_move for in-place search rollback. A precomputed JUMPS adjacency table. In the actual games, the two bots played comparably (both 11 game wins, both 0 capture-all losses to other top-4 bots; Claude even captured 47 pieces to Kimi's 46). But Claude lost a single matchup to Gemini 1-0, the only top-4 bot to lose a matchup to another top-4 bot. Without that one loss, Claude would have shared the 21-match-point tie. The over-engineering didn't translate into stronger play; it apparently allowed one strategic mistake the leaner bots avoided. Authoring detail: Claude's bot had to be regenerated once because the first generation pass entered an infinite chain-of-thought loop. Kimi's first pass produced its 364-line bot directly. Day 15 — SquishyWordBits (writeup) Bit-packing puzzle. Letters are encoded as variable-length binary numbers: a=0, b=1, c=10, d=11, e=100, … z=11001. The encoding is not prefix-free, so the same bit substring can correspond to multiple letter sequences. Bots find non-overlapping word encodings as substrings of a 10,000-to-20,000-bit uniform-random bitstream. Score per accepted word

Got this absolute gem of a response from Claude

Since when did Claude have a jd😭 PS. I did add instruct for it to act as software development advisor. But I didn't expect me to refuse to do it outright lol submitted by /u/Low_Original_1247 [link] [comments]

Why do AI responses get worse after a while of working on them? And what to do with it

AIs have a known problem (it's called context rot): the longer the chat, the worse the responses. Even staying on the same topic. The model begins to confuse old decisions with new ones, re-proposes ideas that have already been discarded, loses the thread of what is current and what is not. It's not a bug, it's how they work. More context to manage, more noise in reasoning. The solution I use: divide the work into multiple chats carrying only the context you need. The basic mechanism is simple: when a chat gets too long, I ask the AI itself to produce a brief of what we said to each other - decisions made, rational, current state. No noise, just the status quo. Then I open a new chat, paste the brief and start from there. This works for both one-off jobs and ongoing projects. In the second case I add a level above: An overview of the project always available. On Claude I put it in the Projects: either directly in the system prompt, or in a knowledge base document referenced by the system prompt. ChatGPT has GPTs, Gemini has Gems - the principle is the same. If you don't use Projects, that's fine too: keep the overview in a separate document and paste it at the beginning of each new chat. Peripheral briefs for each specific topic. Short documents, with the updated status quo (not the changelog) and the rationale for the decisions taken. No more and no less than what is needed. A chat for each work phase. As a rule of thumb, after about twenty shifts it is already time to evaluate whether to close and open a new one starting from the updated brief. If you notice that the responses start to get worse, it's already late. What changes, in practice: – The answers remain lucid because the model does not have to dig through 200 messages. – Hallucinations are reduced because the context is clean and verified. – Credits last longer because you don't pay to reread kilometer-long chats every turn. The principle underneath it all: bring no more and no less than the context needed to make the decision. The chat is not an archive to accumulate. It is a reasoning tool. And like any tool, it performs better if you keep it clean. submitted by /u/kappadielle [link] [comments]

Instagram reels web scrapping

​ Hey guys, I'm not a programmer and I don't have deep knowledge with Claude Code, but I was trying to use it to watch and take notes for me about a bunch of Instagram reels I saved. Sounds dumb, but I love saving reels about travel tips, specific destinations, hidden gems, that kind of stuff. What I usually do is save posts into folders inside Instagram, and then one random day I sit down and manually take notes about every cool place I found, pin them on a map, try to figure out the best route between them, check if certain activities can be done on the same day, how long each one takes, etc. I was hoping Claude could cut some of that work for me, watch the reels, extract the destinations and tips, and organize everything into Obsidian notes so its easier to see correlations between places. And I think short-form video is actually really valuable for this kind of thing. A lot of those reels are personal takes on places, someone sharing a hidden restaurant they stumbled upon, or a viewpoint thats not in any guidebook. That kind of experience usually doesnt make it to blogs or travel articles, it just lives in a 30 second reel and kinda disappears. So id love to actually capture and keep that knowledge somewhere. The problem is I sent Claude a bunch of reel links and it said Instagram blocks any external access without a logged in user session. So it cant read anything. Also worth mentioning, im not actually planning a trip right now. Im just collecting dream places that maybe, if I save enough money, I can backpack to in 2 or 3 years. So this is more of a long term travel brain im trying to build than an actual itinerary. Anyone solved something like this? Is there a way to get the captions or transcripts out of saved reels without copying them one by one manually? He gave the idea of downloading them, and using "whisper" to get the transcript audio from it and make the .md Downloading seems like too much job, but maybe if i record my screen, turn on auto play on reels and upload a bigger video it may work. There's a better way (than this whisper that he told me to use) to get data from the visual aspect+audio at the same time ? I'm very enthusiastic about this idea of webscrapping and, as an engineer, i'm really liking the idea of developing some stuff submitted by /u/_juraylan [link] [comments]

Built a set of skill files for Claude and Gemini that make every session start warm instead of cold

One thing that frustrates me about most AI workflows is the cold start problem. Every new session you re-explain your business, your voice, your clients. I started solving this with skill files. A skill file is a markdown document you upload to a Claude Project or paste into a Gemini Gem. It holds your context permanently so you never re-explain anything. The three I use most: brand-voice.md: defines tone, writing rules, and platform-specific formatting client-router.md: when you say a client name, Claude loads their full project context automatically seo-aeo-audit-checklist.md: structured audit that scores any website out of 100 across 7 sections including AI search visibility Anyone else using a similar system? Curious what context you keep persistent across sessions.

I'm building a guide for the "Free Version" of Claude, what are your best "hidden" tips for Artifacts and Projects and skills?

I've been using Claude for 2 years for basic brainstorming, but I've realized I've been ignoring the powerful stuff like Artifacts and custom instructions. I'm putting together a "Masterclass" for people who don't want to pay for Pro. What’s one feature, tip, or "skill" that completely changed how you use the free version? I'm trying to compile the most efficient, non-paid workflows to help others get the most out of the base model. Let’s share some hacks. And if you do follow some creators out there with absolute gem content on AI and not just slop, please mention them so i can check them out. Thank you in advance..... submitted by /u/Senpai_Ankit [link] [comments]