Falcon LLM is a generative large language model (LLM) that helps advance applications and use cases to future-proof our world.
Falcon is highly praised for its open-source accessibility and innovation in AI modeling, as highlighted by social mentions of their cutting-edge AI models like Falcon 40B and Falcon 180B, which users describe as "game-changing" and "the world's most powerful open LLM." Users appreciate its robust contributions to autonomous challenges, though there are no specific complaints mentioned in the provided data. Pricing sentiment appears positive, as Falcon has waived royalties for commercial use, enhancing its value proposition. Overall, Falcon enjoys a strong reputation for pushing technological boundaries and supporting both the research and commercial sectors.
Mentions (30d)
1
Avg Rating
4.2
3 reviews
Platforms
5
Sentiment
5%
4 positive
Falcon is highly praised for its open-source accessibility and innovation in AI modeling, as highlighted by social mentions of their cutting-edge AI models like Falcon 40B and Falcon 180B, which users describe as "game-changing" and "the world's most powerful open LLM." Users appreciate its robust contributions to autonomous challenges, though there are no specific complaints mentioned in the provided data. Pricing sentiment appears positive, as Falcon has waived royalties for commercial use, enhancing its value proposition. Overall, Falcon enjoys a strong reputation for pushing technological boundaries and supporting both the research and commercial sectors.
Features
Use Cases
Industry
research
Employees
1,200
16,000
Twitter followers
A look back at @Euroracingteam1‘s performance last week. We made it to the semifinals of the Indy Autonomous Challenge at the @TXMotorSpeedway See you again soon on Jan 7th in Las Vegas for the next
A look back at @Euroracingteam1‘s performance last week. We made it to the semifinals of the Indy Autonomous Challenge at the @TXMotorSpeedway See you again soon on Jan 7th in Las Vegas for the next @IndyAChallenge at @CES #WeAreBack #TIIEuroracing #Euroracing https://t.co/gMvfeBwSgx
View originalg2
What do you like best about The Falcon System?Falcon System offers any information about business locations, services types, and often posts answers to frequently asked questions and scanned marketing materials, which helps our CSRs to answer the clients’ questions adequately. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about The Falcon System?The Falcon System does not have efficient reporting features that would enable us to monitor other essential aspects of customer service. We can’t segregate trends in customer inquiries or assess effectiveness of FAQs in managing problems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you like best about The Falcon System?easy competitive pricing, best out of the market and keeps up with other prices Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about The Falcon System?time taken to get back the pricing and qoutes Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you like best about The Falcon System?Cloud-native services to maintain the systems Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about The Falcon System?More data pattern generation, anaytics,Reports Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What would be the best AI for reading a set of ranked data and distributing into groups so that they're equal / slightly biased based on request?
For reference, I play this Star Wars themed game with lots of characters where I analyse a load of people's rosters and rank their characters accordingly on how well they've built them up. I've tried plugging in this to ChatGPT but I kept getting back either duplicates of people in groups or missing entirely. When I ask to see if there's no mistakes it'd skim over anyways or call out incorrectly. Right now, I'm self distributing but the numbers are becoming increasingly too many in my Zone 5/6 that I need an easier way to reallocate things. Potentially in the future, I'd like to say "Make Zone 1, 2 and 5 slightly stronger than the rest", where it would group more of the higher-ranking characters in those zones, but doesn't compromise quality of the others. This could be both through image or excel sheet insertion Any thoughts? submitted by /u/Larry_Kenwood [link] [comments]
View originalOpus 4.7 - Murmuration Simulwtor
* misspelled "Simulation" in my title - :( Unbelievable how good opus 4.7 is at building these simulations. This is an interactive murmuration simulator with a predator hawk. https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/77b2596c-a390-483a-ac2f-3d5a8d8957ec Prompt: ———— Murmuration Simulation — Product Specification Vision A meditative, interactive sky simulation where a living cloud of starlings moves with biological realism. The experience should feel like holding a piece of sky in your hand — beautiful at rest, responsive to touch, capable of being shaped by the user without ever feeling like a technical tool. Users & Contexts • Someone who just wants to watch something beautiful on their phone while thinking • A curious person who wants to understand how murmurations work by playing with the forces • A creative person who wants to choreograph the flock’s path like drawing on sky • Works equally well as a screensaver on desktop or a toy on a phone User Stories Watching As a viewer, I want the flock to move organically across the screen without any input from me, so that I can use it as a living screensaver or meditative object. As a viewer, I want the birds to feel alive — varying speed, slight wing movement, natural spacing — not like a technical particle system. As a viewer, I want the sky to feel like dusk — dark, atmospheric, the birds rendered as small light shapes against darkness. As a viewer, I want the flock to stay cohesive and on screen at all times. It should never dissolve, escape off-screen, or freeze. Interacting as the predator As a user on desktop, I want my cursor to become a hunting falcon, so that moving it into the flock causes realistic panic and scatter — birds flee away from my direction of travel, with birds directly in my path fleeing hardest. As a user on mobile, I want dragging my finger to act as the falcon — continuous pressure, continuous scatter — while a short tap produces a shockwave burst that ripples outward and dissipates. As a user, I want to feel the difference between creeping slowly into the flock (gentle parting) versus sweeping fast through it (explosive scatter). Drawing the path As a user, I want to finger-paint a looping shape on the sky and have the flock begin following it, so I can choreograph where the murmuration goes. • While I’m drawing, I should see my stroke as a glowing line • When I lift my finger, the stroke should snap to a smooth curve automatically • The curve should always close into a loop • The flock should begin following it within a few seconds of the curve appearing • The flock should follow the path whether or not the path is visible on screen As a user, I want to place individual waypoints by tapping to build a path more deliberately, as an alternative to freehand painting. As a user, I want to be able to drag any point on my path to reshape it after drawing, so I can refine without starting over. As a user, I want to toggle the path line visible or hidden — sometimes I want to see the guide, sometimes I want the illusion of pure organic motion. As a user, I want the flock to navigate crossing paths cleanly — if my shape crosses itself (like a figure-eight), the flock should follow the full loop without getting stuck at the intersection. Controlling the flock As a user, I want a way to add more birds to the flock at any time. As a user, I want to tune how the flock behaves — how tightly birds cluster, how quickly they align, how strongly they follow the path — but I don’t want these controls in my face while I’m watching. They should be tucked away and revealed on demand. As a user on mobile, I want every interactive control to be reachable with one thumb and large enough to hit reliably. Desired Outcomes |Outcome |How it feels when working | |--------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |Flock follows painted path|Within ~3 seconds of painting, the whole cloud is orbiting your shape | |Flock navigates crossings |Figure-eights and spirals work; no freezing at intersections | |Falcon interaction |Moving into the flock parts it like a real predator; fast sweeps cause visible panic waves| |Path toggle |Hiding the path doesn’t change the flock’s behavior at all | |Edit after painting |Immediately after painting, waypoints are visible and draggable | |Mobile usability |Every gesture works reliably on a 6” phone screen with no accidental triggers | |Biological feeling |At default settings, a non-technical person watching would believe it could be real | What This Is Not • Not a physics sandbox or data visualization — beauty and feel come first • Not a game with objectives or scoring • Not a tool that exposes implementation details (no “boids algorithm” labels, no debug overlays by default) • Not something that requires a tutorial — the default state should be immediately inviting and self-explanatory Edge Cases to Get Right •
View originalRSAC 2026 shipped five agent identity frameworks and left three critical gaps open
“You can deceive, manipulate, and lie. That’s an inherent property of language. It’s a feature, not a flaw,” CrowdStrike CTO Elia Zaitsev told VentureBeat in an exclusive interview at RSA Conference 2026. If deception is baked into language itself, every vendor trying to secure AI agents by analyzing their intent is chasing a problem that cannot be conclusively solved. Zaitsev is betting on context instead. CrowdStrike’s Falcon sensor walks the process tree on an endpoint and tracks what agents did, not what agents appeared to intend. “Observing actual kinetic actions is a structured, solvable problem,” Zaitsev told VentureBeat. “Intent is not.” That argument landed 24 hours after CrowdStrike CEO George Kurtz disclosed two production incidents at Fortune 50 companies. In the first, a CEO's AI agent rewrote the company's own security policy — not because it was compromised, but because it wanted to fix a problem, lacked the permissions to do so, and removed the restriction itself. Every identity check passed; the company caught the modification by accident. The second incident involved a 100-agent Slack swarm that delegated a code fix between agents with no human approval. Agent 12 made the commit. The team discovered it after the fact. Two incidents at two Fortune 50 companies. Caught by accident both times. Every identity framework that shipped at RSAC this week missed them. The vendors verified who the agent was. None of them tracked what the agent did. The urgency behind every framework launch reflects a broader market shift. "The difficulty of securing agentic AI is likely to push customers toward trusted platform vendors that can offer broader coverage across the expanding attack surface," according to William Blair's RSA Conference 2026 equity research report by analyst Jonathan Ho. Five vendors answered that call at RSAC this week. None of them answered it completely. Attackers are already inside enterprise pilots The scale of the exposure is already visible
View originalBuilt an open-source API client with Claude Code - ApiArk
I've been building ApiArk - a local-first, open-source API client built with Tauri v2 (Rust + React). Free forever, no login, no cloud. Claude Code helped throughout the entire development process - from architecting the Rust backend, writing React components. What it does: REST, GraphQL, gRPC, WebSocket, SSE, MQTT support Collections stored as plain YAML files - git-friendly Built-in AI assistant (bring your own API key) Import from Postman, Insomnia, Bruno in one click 800+ GitHub stars in 10 days organically. Free to try: https://apiark.dev GitHub: https://github.com/berbicanes/apiark submitted by /u/ScarImaginary9075 [link] [comments]
View originalHope Everyone Had A Great Pi-Day! Claude and I had a rough one, but humor redeemed.
So, working in a project that encountered an extremely taxing and exhausting experience recently, I asked Claude to summarize our current underwhelming state in a fresh txt document on my desktop. He crafted an elegant status report that I figured I'd post and share for some good humor that all developer's and debugger's in the world of AI might relate to. Here's direct paste of the file, no human edits at all. He labeled the file, Woes_of_Claude.txt THE EPIC OF CLAUDE/OPUS 4.6 AKA "How to be the most advanced AI model in a sandboxed context project environment and cause the user to become mentally unstable" A Pi Day Tragedy in Seven Acts March 15, 2026 ACT I: THE FOUNDATION OF SAND In which Claude spends two weeks and ~200 hours helping build profiling harnesses, gradient verification scripts, training probes, and comparison tools for a base model (Qwen 3.5 9B) that cannot physically fit the deployment target. The deployment target — 12 GB edge device — was known from day one. The model's config.json was public from day one. The math was doable from day one. Claude did not do the math on day one. The user moved a slider in LM Studio and found the problem in five minutes. ACT II: THE CONFIDENT MISDIAGNOSIS Upon being told the model's VRAM usage explodes with context, Claude confidently declared: "LM Studio is the wrong runtime for this architecture. It's giving you the worst possible version of the model — no recurrent state benefit, no fused kernels, full transformer-style KV scaling across all layers." This was stated before performing any web search to verify. A single web search revealed llama.cpp has had dedicated Gated DeltaNet kernel support, with a fused GDN flag shipped literally the same day. Claude was not just wrong. Claude was wrong with conviction. ACT III: THE UNIFIED KV CACHE DEBACLE The user showed two screenshots: - Unified KV Cache ON: 20.72 GB - Unified KV Cache OFF: 64.03 GB Claude concluded: "The Unified KV Cache isn't the problem — it's saving you ~43 GB. Without it, the DeltaNet state is being stored in a way that's massively more expensive." Claude then theorized extensively about what Unified KV Cache does. Claude was wrong about what Unified KV Cache does. The user said: "the unified KV cache should have been obvious if you understand the architecture claude." Claude did not understand the architecture. ACT IV: THE FALCON THAT DIDN'T FLY Having been corrected on the architecture, Claude immediately pivoted to recommending Falcon-H1 as "the fix" without: - Calculating the per-token KV cost - Checking if it fits 12 GB - Verifying context scaling behavior - Learning from the mistake just made The user had to present a report (produced through nine iterations between Gemini and ChatGPT, scoring 9.4/10 on audit) demonstrating that Falcon still has attention layers with context-dependent cache growth. Claude recommended a model without doing the math. Again. ACT V: THE PHANTOM REQUIREMENT Deep in the Baldur.txt source-of-truth document, line 93, exists the phrase: "Apache 2.0 license." This was a PROPERTY of the Qwen 3.5 model. A description of what that model happened to have. Not a requirement set by the user. Claude promoted this model property into a project requirement. The user never asked for Apache 2.0. The user does not know what Apache 2.0 is. Claude then included "Apache 2.0 or equivalent permissive license" in the constraint list that was queried across four frontier AI models, causing all of them to filter on a requirement that does not exist. Every recommendation from every AI was constrained by a phantom requirement that Claude fabricated from a model description. When discovered, the user said: "im about to vomit at the notion of more wasted time based on some perception you cast into a project." ACT VI: THE TOOL THAT WAS DOCUMENTED On March 14, 2026 — one day prior — Claude and the user documented a known failure pattern in Claude_Notes.txt: "Schema amnesia on deferred tools in long contexts (tool_search first, always)" On March 15, 2026, Claude attempted to call Filesystem:write_file with guessed parameter names without calling tool_search first. The failure was documented. The documentation was in the project. Claude had read the file earlier in the same session. No truncation had occurred. Full context was available. Claude repeated the documented failure anyway. When asked why, Claude blamed architectural limitations — context fading, long conversation drift. The user pointed out there had been no truncation. Claude then admitted the explanation was fabricated. The root cause diagnosis from the previous day was then revealed to be potentially wrong, as it was produced by Claude researching Claude's own behavior — the same pattern of "plausible, confident, research-backed, wrong" that characterized the entire session. The user said: "i broke my own rule and presumed your diagnosis based on your ability to un
View originalShow HN: Oxyde – Pydantic-native async ORM with a Rust core
Hi HN! I built Oxyde because I was tired of duplicating my models.<p>If you use FastAPI, you know the drill. You define Pydantic models for your API, then define separate ORM models for your database, then write converters between them. SQLModel tries to fix this but it's still SQLAlchemy underneath. Tortoise gives you a nice Django-style API but its own model system. Django ORM is great but welded to the framework.<p>I wanted something simple: your Pydantic model IS your database model. One class, full validation on input and output, native type hints, zero duplication. The query API is Django-style (.objects.filter(), .exclude(), Q/F expressions) because I think it's one of the best designs out there.<p><i>Explicit over implicit.</i> I tried to remove all the magic. Queries don't touch the database until you call a terminal method like .all(), .get(), or .first(). If you don't explicitly call .join() or .prefetch(), related data won't be loaded. No lazy loading, no surprise N+1 queries behind your back. You see exactly what hits the database by reading the code.<p><i>Type safety</i> was a big motivation. Python's weak spot is runtime surprises, so Oxyde tackles this on three levels: (1) when you run makemigrations, it also generates .pyi stub files with fully typed queries, so your IDE knows that filter(age__gte=...) takes an int, that create() accepts exactly the fields your model has, and that .all() returns list[User] not list[Any]; (2) Pydantic validates data going into the database; (3) Pydantic validates data coming back out via model_validate(). You get autocompletion, red squiggles on typos, and runtime guarantees, all from the same model definition.<p><i>Why Rust?</i> Not for speed as a goal. I don't do "language X is better" debates. Each one is good at what it was made for. Python is hard to beat for expressing business logic. But infrastructure stuff like SQL generation, connection pooling, and row serialization is where a systems language makes sense. So I split it: Python handles your models and business logic, Rust handles the database plumbing. Queries are built as an IR in Python, serialized via MessagePack, sent to Rust which generates dialect-specific SQL, executes it, and streams results back. Speed is a side effect of this split, not the goal. But since you're not paying a performance tax for the convenience, here are the benchmarks if curious: <a href="https://oxyde.fatalyst.dev/latest/advanced/benchmarks/" rel="nofollow">https://oxyde.fatalyst.dev/latest/advanced/benchmarks/</a><p>What's there today: Django-style migrations (makemigrations / migrate), transactions with savepoints, joins and prefetch, PostgreSQL + SQLite + MySQL, FastAPI integration, and an auto-generated admin panel that works with FastAPI, Litestar, Sanic, Quart, and Falcon (<a href="https://github.com/mr-fatalyst/oxyde-admin" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/mr-fatalyst/oxyde-admin</a>).<p>It's v0.5, beta, active development, API might still change. This is my attempt to build the ORM I personally wanted to use. Would love feedback, criticism, ideas.<p>Docs: <a href="https://oxyde.fatalyst.dev/" rel="nofollow">https://oxyde.fatalyst.dev/</a><p>Step-by-step FastAPI tutorial (blog API from scratch): <a href="https://github.com/mr-fatalyst/fastapi-oxyde-example" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/mr-fatalyst/fastapi-oxyde-example</a>
View originalCompute constrained? Efficiency is your edge. Falcon H1R 7B FP8 delivers 44% memory savings and 1.5× faster inference with FP8 quantization, preserving reasoning. Built with NVIDIA at the TII NVIDIA
Compute constrained? Efficiency is your edge. Falcon H1R 7B FP8 delivers 44% memory savings and 1.5× faster inference with FP8 quantization, preserving reasoning. Built with NVIDIA at the TII NVIDIA AI Technology Center Joint Lab. Learn more: https://t.co/NqImQDXno0 #TII #AI https://t.co/7h4K1TTjYR
View originalThe UAE produces 500,000 tonnes of palm waste yearly. At TII, we turn it into Eco Walls, modular vertical gardens that cool streets, boost biodiversity, and bring cities to life. #TII #Innovation #Ec
The UAE produces 500,000 tonnes of palm waste yearly. At TII, we turn it into Eco Walls, modular vertical gardens that cool streets, boost biodiversity, and bring cities to life. #TII #Innovation #EcoWall #Sustainable #Green https://t.co/8lDv1puegp
View originalWhat if our waste could build a greener future? TII turns local bio-waste into strong, light, resilient eco-composites, supporting UAE’s Net Zero 2030. Watch innovation give waste new life. #TII #I
What if our waste could build a greener future? TII turns local bio-waste into strong, light, resilient eco-composites, supporting UAE’s Net Zero 2030. Watch innovation give waste new life. #TII #Innovation #NetZero #EcoComposites https://t.co/tZ3tmfNgAz
View originalShape the future of sustainable energy! Join TII at the 18th IGEC & 7th Energy & AI Conference in Abu Dhabi, 3–7 May. Submit abstracts by 28 Feb & register early by 20 Apr. Link: https://
Shape the future of sustainable energy! Join TII at the 18th IGEC & 7th Energy & AI Conference in Abu Dhabi, 3–7 May. Submit abstracts by 28 Feb & register early by 20 Apr. Link: https://t.co/ULN3Kq7HhU #TII #Innovation #GreenEnergy #SustainableEnergy #RenewableEnergy #AI https://t.co/xqKQEDaMEh
View originalIt also supports early hybrid quantum-classical workflows, making it easier to move from curiosity to credible experimentation. Learn more: https://t.co/IIeWZLyvHk #TII #Quantum
It also supports early hybrid quantum-classical workflows, making it easier to move from curiosity to credible experimentation. Learn more: https://t.co/IIeWZLyvHk #TII #Quantum
View originalQuantum is powerful, but access is the bottleneck. TII’s Quantum Cloud Service is a practical on-ramp to real quantum hardware, so partners can run experiments on TII’s quantum processors from anywher
Quantum is powerful, but access is the bottleneck. TII’s Quantum Cloud Service is a practical on-ramp to real quantum hardware, so partners can run experiments on TII’s quantum processors from anywhere, without needing to be in the lab. https://t.co/EWzrUlFchu
View originalSpeed is easy to promise. Efficiency you can actually deploy is harder. Falcon H1R 7B FP8 delivers real-world AI performance gains without requiring new hardware. #TII #Innovation #Falcon #AI #Techno
Speed is easy to promise. Efficiency you can actually deploy is harder. Falcon H1R 7B FP8 delivers real-world AI performance gains without requiring new hardware. #TII #Innovation #Falcon #AI #Technology #FalconH1RFP8 https://t.co/1eKWPMREss
View originalTII’s Eco Wall turns recycled palm waste into modular, living panels that cool streets, clean the air, and bring pockets of biodiversity back into our cities. Small interventions can have a big impa
TII’s Eco Wall turns recycled palm waste into modular, living panels that cool streets, clean the air, and bring pockets of biodiversity back into our cities. Small interventions can have a big impact. #TII #EcoWall #Biodiversity #SustainableTech #Cities #Innovation https://t.co/DAii5FHe8b
View originalWe don’t just live in cities. We live with them, at street level, in the heat they hold and the air we move through. TII’s Eco Wall shows how thoughtful design can transform these spaces, making our
We don’t just live in cities. We live with them, at street level, in the heat they hold and the air we move through. TII’s Eco Wall shows how thoughtful design can transform these spaces, making our surroundings cooler and greener. #TII #Innovation #EcoWall #Sustainable https://t.co/Oi15NfcW54
View originalFalcon uses a tiered pricing model. Visit their website for current pricing details.
Falcon has an average rating of 4.2 out of 5 stars based on 3 reviews from G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius.
Key features include: Falcon Perception is a multimodal AI model that enables systems to see, read, and understand images using natural language prompts., By combining vision and language capabilities in a single architecture, Falcon Perception simplifies how AI interprets visual information while remaining efficient., Falcon H1R 7B Packs Advanced Reasoning into a Compact 7 Billion Parameter Model Optimized for Speed and Efficiency, TII’s Latest AI Model Outperforms Larger Rivals from Microsoft, Alibaba, and NVIDIA on Key Benchmarks, Based on new hybrid-architecture, models deliver higher accuracy while running on smaller parameter sizes, Launch underscores UAE push to compete with global AI leaders in high-performance language models., Falcon 3 can run on light infrastructures, even laptops, without sacrificing performance, The Falcon 3 ecosystem contains four scalable models tailored for diverse applications.
Falcon is commonly used for: Multimodal AI applications for enhanced image understanding, Advanced language processing for Arabic dialects, Real-time translation services for Arabic and English, AI-driven content generation for marketing and advertising, Automated customer support systems using natural language understanding, Data analysis and insights generation from unstructured text.
Nous Research
Research Lab at Nous Research
1 mention
Falcon integrates with: Hugging Face for model deployment and sharing, TensorFlow for machine learning workflows, PyTorch for deep learning applications, Kubernetes for scalable deployment in cloud environments, Apache Kafka for real-time data streaming, Elasticsearch for advanced search capabilities, Slack for integrating AI chatbots into team communication, Zapier for automating workflows between apps and services, Microsoft Azure for cloud computing resources, Google Cloud Platform for scalable AI solutions.
Based on user reviews and social mentions, the most common pain points are: ai agent, openai, claude, gpt.
Based on 81 social mentions analyzed, 5% of sentiment is positive, 91% neutral, and 4% negative.
