PayloopPayloop
CommunityVoicesToolsDiscoverLeaderboardReportsBlog
Save Up to 65% on AI
Powered by Payloop — LLM Cost Intelligence
Tools/Cursor vs Continue
Cursor

Cursor

dev-tools
vs
Continue

Continue

dev-tools

Cursor vs Continue — Comparison

Overview
What each tool does and who it's for

Cursor

Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to build software with AI.

Based on the social mentions provided, "Cursor" appears to be well-regarded as an AI coding tool that users actively employ for development work. Users appreciate its capabilities as an AI coding assistant, with mentions placing it alongside other respected tools like Claude Code and V0 for building UI features and handling coding tasks. However, some users express concerns about cost tracking and transparency, noting frustrations with spending money on AI coding tools without clear visibility into usage patterns or costs. The tool seems to have gained significant adoption among developers, being mentioned in the same breath as other established AI development platforms, suggesting it has earned a solid reputation in the AI coding space.

Continue

Source-controlled AI checks on every pull request. Standards as checks, enforced by AI, decided by humans.

Based on the provided content, there are no actual reviews or social mentions specifically about "Continue" as a software tool. The social mentions appear to be from Hacker News and Lemmy discussing various unrelated topics including database tools (PgDog), containerization platforms (Coasts), and political articles, but none mention or review a product called "Continue." Without relevant user feedback about Continue specifically, I cannot provide a meaningful summary of user sentiment, strengths, complaints, or pricing opinions for this tool.

Key Metrics
—
Avg Rating
—
7
Mentions (30d)
5
—
GitHub Stars
32,190
—
GitHub Forks
4,308
—
npm Downloads/wk
—
—
PyPI Downloads/mo
—
Community Sentiment
How developers feel about each tool based on mentions and reviews

Cursor

0% positive100% neutral0% negative

Continue

0% positive100% neutral0% negative
Pricing

Cursor

usage-based + subscription + tiered

Pricing found: $20 / mo, $60 / mo, $200 / mo, $40 / user, $40 / user

Continue

contract + per-seat + tiered

Pricing found: $3 / million, $20 / seat, $10

Features

Only in Cursor (10)

Agents turn ideas into codeWorks autonomously, runs in parallelIn every tool, at every stepMagically accurate autocompleteUse the best model for every taskComplete codebase understandingDevelop enduring softwareProductResourcesCompany

Only in Continue (4)

productScales with your factoryConsistency over breadthFocus on designing, not reviewing
Developer Ecosystem
—
GitHub Repos
67
—
GitHub Followers
1,311
—
npm Packages
20
—
HuggingFace Models
8
—
SO Reputation
—
Pain Points
Top complaints from reviews and social mentions

Cursor

ai agent (3)cost tracking (3)token cost (3)large language model (1)anthropic (1)claude (1)budget (1)anthropic bill (1)budget alert (1)API bill (1)

Continue

$500 bill (3)token usage (1)raises (1)ai agent (1)openai (1)anthropic (1)claude (1)gpt (1)spending too much (1)
Product Screenshots

Cursor

Cursor screenshot 1Cursor screenshot 2

Continue

Continue screenshot 1
Company Intel
information technology & services
Industry
information technology & services
300
Employees
19
$3.2B
Funding
$2.2M
Series D
Stage
Seed
Supported Languages & Categories

Cursor

AI/MLSecurityAnalytics

Continue

AI agentsbackground agentscontinuous AIGitHub automationSentry automation
View Cursor Profile View Continue Profile