PayloopPayloop
CommunityVoicesToolsDiscoverLeaderboardReportsBlog
Save Up to 65% on AI
Powered by Payloop — LLM Cost Intelligence
Tools/Continue vs Cursor
Continue

Continue

dev-tools
vs
Cursor

Cursor

dev-tools

Continue vs Cursor — Comparison

Overview
What each tool does and who it's for

Continue

Source-controlled AI checks on every pull request. Standards as checks, enforced by AI, decided by humans.

Based on the provided content, there are no actual reviews or social mentions specifically about "Continue" as a software tool. The social mentions appear to be from Hacker News and Lemmy discussing various unrelated topics including database tools (PgDog), containerization platforms (Coasts), and political articles, but none mention or review a product called "Continue." Without relevant user feedback about Continue specifically, I cannot provide a meaningful summary of user sentiment, strengths, complaints, or pricing opinions for this tool.

Cursor

Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to build software with AI.

Based on the social mentions provided, "Cursor" appears to be well-regarded as an AI coding tool that users actively employ for development work. Users appreciate its capabilities as an AI coding assistant, with mentions placing it alongside other respected tools like Claude Code and V0 for building UI features and handling coding tasks. However, some users express concerns about cost tracking and transparency, noting frustrations with spending money on AI coding tools without clear visibility into usage patterns or costs. The tool seems to have gained significant adoption among developers, being mentioned in the same breath as other established AI development platforms, suggesting it has earned a solid reputation in the AI coding space.

Key Metrics
—
Avg Rating
—
5
Mentions (30d)
7
32,190
GitHub Stars
—
4,308
GitHub Forks
—
—
npm Downloads/wk
—
—
PyPI Downloads/mo
—
Community Sentiment
How developers feel about each tool based on mentions and reviews

Continue

0% positive100% neutral0% negative

Cursor

0% positive100% neutral0% negative
Pricing

Continue

contract + per-seat + tiered

Pricing found: $3 / million, $20 / seat, $10

Cursor

usage-based + subscription + tiered

Pricing found: $20 / mo, $60 / mo, $200 / mo, $40 / user, $40 / user

Features

Only in Continue (4)

productScales with your factoryConsistency over breadthFocus on designing, not reviewing

Only in Cursor (10)

Agents turn ideas into codeWorks autonomously, runs in parallelIn every tool, at every stepMagically accurate autocompleteUse the best model for every taskComplete codebase understandingDevelop enduring softwareProductResourcesCompany
Developer Ecosystem
67
GitHub Repos
—
1,311
GitHub Followers
—
20
npm Packages
—
8
HuggingFace Models
—
—
SO Reputation
—
Pain Points
Top complaints from reviews and social mentions

Continue

$500 bill (3)token usage (1)raises (1)ai agent (1)openai (1)anthropic (1)claude (1)gpt (1)spending too much (1)

Cursor

ai agent (3)cost tracking (3)token cost (3)large language model (1)anthropic (1)claude (1)budget (1)anthropic bill (1)budget alert (1)API bill (1)
Product Screenshots

Continue

Continue screenshot 1

Cursor

Cursor screenshot 1Cursor screenshot 2
Company Intel
information technology & services
Industry
information technology & services
19
Employees
300
$2.2M
Funding
$3.2B
Seed
Stage
Series D
Supported Languages & Categories

Continue

AI agentsbackground agentscontinuous AIGitHub automationSentry automation

Cursor

AI/MLSecurityAnalytics
View Continue Profile View Cursor Profile