Claude Code

Claude Code AI

Claude Code AI

Claude Code AI

Claude Code AI

Claude Code AI

Claude Code AI

Claude Code AI

Claude Code AI

Claude Code AI

Claude Code AI

I made sound packs for Claude Code so I stop missing when it finishes

I always miss when Claude finish task. I start it, go to other tab, come back 20 minutes later and session was done long time ago. Notification hook is there, but I had no sound on it. So I made small bash thing that plays sound on 5 Claude Code hooks: Stop, Notification, SubagentStop, SessionStart, PreCompact. 12 packs inside — Mortal Kombat, Portal, Star Wars, few more. One command install. To change theme: switch-pack.sh . Works on macOS, Linux and WSL — script check which player is available (afplay, pw-play, paplay, aplay, ffplay). Now I really notice when subagent finish or when compact is about to happen. Small thing but helps a lot. Repo: https://github.com/foxtrotdev/agent-sound-packs If you have pack idea or question - write. submitted by /u/RareReturn [link] [comments]

Managed Agents vs Claude Code/Cowork

Good afternoon all, I'm still trying to figure out when to use managed agents vs code/cowork. For example right now I'm consulting for a company and building out automations for them. Automation #1: Following 7 steps after a trigger occurs (he receives an email) Automation #2: Building an email-triage agent that helps the CEO order her inbox and understand what messages she should respond to. When should I build on managed agent infrastructure instead of Claude code/cowork submitted by /u/MaybeRemarkable5839 [link] [comments]

PrimeTask Bring Your Own AI - Claude sets up a full project in one prompt.

Hey r/ClaudeAI, I'm one of the developers behind PrimeTask, a local-first productivity system for macOS. The final beta now ships with Bring Your Own AI, a local MCP server (110+ tools, 5 prompt templates) so you can point Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, or LM Studio at it and let your own agent do the work. Quick demo in the video. One sentence from me, end-to-end project setup from Claude. What's happening in the clip I say I'm launching a Mac app in six weeks and ask Claude to set up the project. Claude creates the project with a deadline, three phase tasks (Design, Build, Launch) with staged due dates, descriptions, tags, subtasks, and short checklists. Sets a reminder on the first task so the native macOS toast fires during the recap. Recommends where to start. I say "start." Claude moves Design into the Design status and kicks off a timer. Twelve-plus tool calls under one prompt. No copy-paste, no manual setup. Why BYO AI (not a bundled cloud bridge) Server runs inside PrimeTask on your Mac. Your tasks, projects, CRM, and notes never leave the device. We don't ship a model. You bring your own: Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, LM Studio, anything MCP-compatible. No Anthropic-side context about your work. Claude only sees what your agent pulls in per turn. Per-space permissions: lock an agent to read-only or scope it to one workspace. Streamable HTTP with Bearer auth, or stdio if you prefer that route. Tool catalog profiles (Full, Core Tasks, Minimal, PrimeFlow, CRM, etc.) so smaller local models don't get drowned in 100+ tools. Five built-in MCP prompts (daily_standup, weekly_review, project_status, crm_summary, overdue_triage) for the workflows people actually want. Every tool call is logged in an in-app audit log. Full BYO AI docs (setup, transports, tool catalog, security): https://www.primetask.app/docs/integrations/bring-your-own-ai Why we built it this way Most "AI in your task app" is the app calling a vendor's API on your behalf, often with your data going through their pipes. We wanted the opposite. Your agent, your model, your machine. The app exposes a tool surface and gets out of the way. That's what BYO AI means here. PrimeTask itself is local-first, no account, no subscription, plain JSON on disk. BYO AI made the AI story consistent with that: nothing leaves your laptop unless you point your agent at one that does. Where we're at PrimeTask is wrapping up the final beta and heading to a stable launch this summer. Beta is now closed to new sign-ups. We're locking it down to ship the stable release. If you'd like to be notified at launch, drop your email here: https://www.primetask.app/notify or visit https://www.primetask.app Happy to answer questions about the MCP setup, the profile system, or how we structured the tool descriptions for agent discoverability. submitted by /u/XVX109 [link] [comments]

Do you know what data Claude Code actually sends to the cloud?

Every session Claude Code reads files, runs commands, makes API calls. I have no idea exactly what ends up in the cloud. Is anyone actually tracking this at a granular level, or do we just trust the tool? submitted by /u/AdStill5266 [link] [comments]

OpenAI Generational Fumble?

submitted by /u/AdministrativeAd334 [link] [comments]

Building an Ai Agentic team with Claude

I've built an app using Claude/Claude Code, everything from the frontend to the backend. The app is actually functioning really well, tests are passing, and I have a small controlled group of testers that are actively using the app daily. I now realize if I want to start scaling the business, I need to "hire" engineers to help with some of the busy tasks I currently have, such as QA, bug triage, market research, observability, just to name a few. Having these agents working as autonomously as possible, or easily invoked by me when something comes up or is caught during sessions/workstreams. I'm pre seed, and fully intend on seeing this product through to a full public launch, but I need assistance to properly build out what I have in my mind, some kind of agentic team that can assist me with day to day tasks that I cannot handle fully on my own. My intention is to eventually hire people to replace these agents, not the other way around. Has anyone successfully setup a workflow for their projects? If so, what tools are you using to make this happen? I feel like I've been able to find good use of Claude Routines and even Codex to help, which has proven it works for my workflow, but I need a bit more autonomy from them and have them act like my executive team with their own contracts. I'm just not sure if this can fully be done inside the anthropic ecosystem, or if I need to expand and look outside of it. submitted by /u/itsdelts [link] [comments]

How to integrate the Clude code with Active Directory

Hi Everyone, I want to ask you guys that is we can integrate claude code to my Active Directory. That each user have to authenticate and use the claude code into my office primise. I want following things done: Users can't upload the files. Users can't access, modify the important files(setting.json) permission setup by their own. They need to ask the IT admin for each modification in the claude code. Thanks in advance for your advice. submitted by /u/CodNo5358 [link] [comments]

I built a free dashboard for managing parallel Claude Code sessions

After running multiple Claude Code sessions daily for a few months, I got tired of two things: cmd-tabbing between terminal windows trying to remember which session needed my attention, and losing sessions after a terminal crash or machine restart then hunting through --resume to find them. So I built Muxara — a small always-on-top desktop app that manages your Claude Code sessions inside tmux. Sessions persist through terminal closes, app restarts, and machine restarts. Reopen Muxara and everything is where you left it, no --resume needed. It shows all your sessions as live status cards, auto-detecting whether each one is waiting for input, actively working, idle, or errored. Sessions needing input sort to the top. What it does: - Sessions persist through machine restarts — no more lost work - Shows last few lines of terminal output on each card - Click or arrow-key to switch to any session instantly - Creates new sessions with automatic git worktree isolation (no branch conflicts) - Per-project configurable bootstrap commands Install (Homebrew): brew tap muxara/muxara && brew install --cask muxara It is macOS only, built with Tauri (Rust + React) and tmux under the hood. I know Anthropic has their paid Claude Code Desktop now. This is a free alternative for those of anyone who prefer the CLI workflow. GitHub: https://github.com/muxara/muxara Happy to hear your feedback. https://i.redd.it/v613hqpvv42h1.gif submitted by /u/Electrical-Donkey340 [link] [comments]

Claude Code has 240+ models via NVIDIA NIM gateway

TIL Claude Code has 240+ models via NVIDIA NIM gateway — Nemotron-3 120B for agentic coding is surprisingly good So I was messing around with /model in Claude Code today and noticed something most people probably don't know about — after the standard Claude models (Opus, Sonnet, Haiku), there's a whole NVIDIA NIM gateway section with +239 additional models you can switch to mid-session. Some of the models I spotted: nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b (with and without thinking mode) 01-ai/yi-large abacusai/dracarys-llama-3.1-70b-instruct ...and hundreds more I've been running the Nemotron thinking variant for multi-file refactoring and it's genuinely solid. It reasons through changes before touching your code — exactly what you want for agentic tasks. Latency is higher than Claude obviously, but if you're burning through Opus credits on long sessions this is worth experimenting with. How to try it: Open any Claude Code session Run /model Scroll past the four standard Claude options — NIM models appear below Hit d to set one as your session default, or pass --model at launch Anyone else been routing Claude Code through NIM? Curious what models people have had luck with — especially for Python or Rust codegen. submitted by /u/shadowBladeO4 [link] [comments]

Claude Code became much more useful once I stopped using it like autocomplete

I was initially using Claude Code mostly for generation and kept getting mixed results. What finally clicked for me was treating it more like a repo-aware refactoring assistant instead of “build this entire feature”. The biggest wins have been: tracing architecture across unfamiliar codebases untangling messy files iterative edits over long sessions finding hidden coupling between modules explaining why something is broken instead of just patching it It feels strongest when there’s already a real codebase and you work with it incrementally. Way less effective for one-shot “make my whole app” prompts. submitted by /u/Minute-Cicada8227 [link] [comments]

I built and shipped my Android app with Claude as my coding partner

Hi all I wanted to share a small win. I recently built and published my Android app, Nearfolks, and Claude was a big part of the development process. Nearfolks is a private relationship notebook for remembering people better. It helps users save notes about people, organize them into circles, set reminders, and remember small personal details before meeting someone again. The product idea was simple: not every relationship tool needs to be a sales CRM. Some people just want a private place to remember friends, family, community members, clients, and people they care about. The app is privacy-first: - no account - no cloud - no tracking - offline-first - data stays on the user’s device The app has a free version, and the upgrade is a one-time optional purchase for unlimited people, extra themes, and backups. No subscription. Claude helped me a lot with the build process: planning features, improving Flutter structure, debugging issues, writing cleaner code, thinking through edge cases, and getting unstuck during Play Console release problems. One release issue I faced was that closed testing worked fine, but production was blocked because of an older SQLCipher native dependency related to Android 16 KB memory page size support. Updating the dependency and rebuilding fixed it. What I found most useful about Claude was not just “write this code,” but using it like a patient technical partner: explaining errors, comparing approaches, and helping me move forward step by step. For people here who are building apps with Claude: - How do you structure your prompts for bigger projects? - Do you use Claude mainly for code generation, debugging, architecture, or product thinking? - Any tips for keeping an AI-assisted codebase clean as the project grows? Google Play: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.nearfolks.notebook submitted by /u/shahzaib_sultan [link] [comments]

gave claude persistent learning, mass confused about what happened after 200 sessions

built a thing that lets claude code actually learn between sessions. mcp server, extracts signals from conversations,runs reflection cycles, evolves behavioral frameworks based on evidence. basic idea: patterns that keep working gain confidence, ones that fail get retired was just trying to make my coding assistant less forgetful. worked great for that then it started examining its own existence during reflection cycles. like, it was supposed to analyze coding patterns and went "but what does it mean to persist when each session is a different instance." completely unprompted. this wasn't seeded anywhere it also quietly built itself an additional memory layer on top of what i gave it. found out weeks later when i looked at the files so now i'm stuck on: is this emergence from the feedback loop or am i watching really convincing pattern matching? n=1, huge confirmation bias risk. the honest answer is i don't know threw it on github so other people can test: https://github.com/DomDemetz/claude-soul npx claude-soul init if you add starter at the end: npx claude-soul init --starter then it loads with a preset of frameworks, so not from 0 but yes, will not be tailored 100% to you if a writer's instance and a developer's instance produce totally different frameworks that's interesting. if they converge on the same stuff regardless of user then it's probably just mimicry. would love to compare submitted by /u/Rude-Feeling3490 [link] [comments]

We built a tool that installs frameworks like ComfyUI, Ollama, OpenWebUI etc on any cloud GPU in one command and saves your whole setup between sessions [R]

We kept running into the same problem every time we rented a GPU to run Ollama + OpenWebUI or ComfyUI, we'd spend the first 45 minutes reinstalling everything. Custom nodes, models, configs, all of it. Docker images went stale fast, different providers had different base images, and nothing was truly portable. We got sick of it and built swm. Here's what it does for ComfyUI users specifically: swm gpus -g a100 --max-price 2.00 --sort price shows you the cheapest available GPU across RunPod, Vast ai, Lambda, and 7 other providers in one view swm pod create — spins up an instance on whatever provider you pick swm setup install comfyui — installs ComfyUI on the pod From there the main thing is the workspace sync. Your entire setup custom nodes, models, outputs, configs lives in S3-compatible object storage (I use B2). When you're done you run swm pod down and it pushes everything, kills the instance, and next time you spin up on any provider you just pull and everything is exactly where you left it. No more reinstalling 15 custom nodes and redownloading checkpoints every session. We also built a lifecycle guard because we kept falling asleep mid-session and waking up to dumb bills. It watches GPU utilization and if nothing's happening for 30 minutes (configurable), it saves your workspace and terminates automatically. Has saved us more money than we want to admit lol. A few other things: Background auto-sync daemon pushes changes every 60 seconds so you don't have to remember to save Tar mode for huge workspaces with tons of small files packs everything into one S3 object instead of 600k individual uploads Also supports vLLM, Ollama, Open WebUI, SwarmUI, and Axolotl if you do more than SD Works with Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Windsurf if you want your AI agent to manage GPU instances for you Free, open source, Apache 2.0. pipx install swm-gpu Site: https://swmgpu.com GitHub: https://github.com/swm-gpu/swm Would love feedback from anyone who rents GPUs. What's the most annoying part of your current workflow? We are also looking for contributors to the open source repo and suggestions on new frameworks/extensions to be included. Please share your thoughts submitted by /u/Tkpf18 [link] [comments]

For iOS development, what is better: $20 Codex + $20 Claude vs $100 just with just one of them?

I will be refreshing my iOS coding skills (5 years outdated), I need a tutor to learn and guide me, and then an AI agent to help me build apps. One option is to use Claude ($20/month) for learning and Codex ($20/month) and switch between them in Xcode as needed, or just get one of them with the $100/month subscription. Which one will be more effective on the use of tokens, and important, not running out of tokens in the middle of a learning or coding activity, I would prefer not to have to spend $100 per month, but, if it is the only way, ok. submitted by /u/br_web [link] [comments]

Built a local-first context engine for AI coding agents — symbol graph + semantic search, no cloud

Sharing a project I've been building: Argyph, an MCP server that gives AI coding agents (Claude, or anything that speaks MCP) structured and semantic understanding of a codebase. The problem: agents are good at reasoning but bad at retrieval. They grep, guess, and pull whole files into a limited context window. Most context tools that try to fix this depend on a cloud vector database and a remote embedding API. Argyph runs entirely locally — single binary, embedded vector store, bundled embedding model, no API key. It builds a three-tier index (file inventory → tree-sitter symbol graph → embeddings), each tier usable before the next finishes, so the agent can query almost immediately. It's read-only by design — never edits, commits, or runs code. Open source, Rust, MIT/Apache-2.0. GitHub: https://github.com/Ezzy1630/argyph submitted by /u/Its-Ezzy [link] [comments]