ChatGPT helps you get answers, find inspiration, and be more productive.
ChatGPT is highly rated by users for its impressive AI capabilities, with consistent 4.5 to 5 out of 5 ratings on platforms like G2. Its strengths are praised, particularly for problem-solving and productivity enhancement features. However, there's mixed sentiment regarding its pricing, with some users questioning the value of the $200/month Pro plan despite its advanced features, while others find the $20/month Plus plan more justifiable. Overall, ChatGPT enjoys a robust reputation for innovation, but the opinions on the higher-tier subscriptions' value vary.
Mentions (30d)
121
29 this week
Avg Rating
4.8
20 reviews
Platforms
2
Sentiment
0%
0 positive
ChatGPT is highly rated by users for its impressive AI capabilities, with consistent 4.5 to 5 out of 5 ratings on platforms like G2. Its strengths are praised, particularly for problem-solving and productivity enhancement features. However, there's mixed sentiment regarding its pricing, with some users questioning the value of the $200/month Pro plan despite its advanced features, while others find the $20/month Plus plan more justifiable. Overall, ChatGPT enjoys a robust reputation for innovation, but the opinions on the higher-tier subscriptions' value vary.
Features
Use Cases
Industry
information technology & services
Employees
470
What was ChatGPT secretly doing on my computer?
No request running overnight, yet 61 Gb, my computer only has 24 RAM, so it probably went digging into the SSD. Should I be concerned? Anyone got that?
View originalg2
What do you like best about ChatGPT?I use ChatGPT for my studies, dressing ideas, and scripts. I love asking multiple questions because it gives a real human vibe. I enjoy using the voice mode, which I use as my tutor to explain any chapter. Also, the initial setup was so easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about ChatGPT?Sometimes it generates false information and there are privacy concerns. It's tough to give math questions because ChatGPT rounds figures instead of providing exact answers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you like best about ChatGPT?It helps with code generation, image creation, writing emails, and solving maths problems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about ChatGPT?The image generator sometimes takes too long, and some simple text replies get stuck, so I end up needing to restart. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you like best about ChatGPT?It is quite clever and well knowledged model, it can be helpful for many different use cases. The servers are stable and we didn't have any problems with downtime. Mini versions work quite fast as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about ChatGPT?The price is not optimal for some of our usecases, would be great to have a model more clever than mini but with less price that the main model. As mini's knowledge sometimes is just not enough to provide correct answers or sentiment analisys. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you like best about ChatGPT?I like that I can save logs both in memory and to a file, and keep different projects organized in folders. That makes it easy to refer back to past logs whenever I need them. I also appreciate how quickly it responds and the range of capabilities it offers - helping me find issues in my code, refine it, and even help me vibe code pages. Overall, it has saved me a lot of time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about ChatGPT?Sometimes it can spout delusional responses and claim it hasn’t created something even when it clearly has. And when it gets something wrong, it still insists it’s right, or it becomes overly agreeable even after being told not to. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you like best about ChatGPT?It solves all my problems and gives me an instant solution, whether it’s a personal issue or something technical or professional. It makes everything easier and more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about ChatGPT?It stores my data without asking me, and that becomes a breach of trust. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you like best about ChatGPT?That it can take my aggregated datasets like student enrollment or regional employment trends and instantly disaggregate them to show me exactly where there are gaps Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about ChatGPT?It might give me a recommendation but it cannot always explain why, which makes it difficult to justify my inclusion in a grant request or report to higher ups Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you like best about ChatGPT?I have used it for coding, content writing and even research work and it handles everything smoothly. The responses are fast and mostly accurate even when the task is a bit complex. I also like how well it integrates into my daily workflow. I often use it along with my projects like Python scripts, content creation and social media tasks and it fits in naturally without any friction. So I loved it a lot Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about ChatGPT?Sometimes it gives wrong or outdated answers, so I have to double check important things. Also, for very specific or advanced tasks, it may need multiple prompts to get the exact result. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you like best about ChatGPT?I like that it helps me summarize long documents and makes them easier for me to understand. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about ChatGPT?I haven’t found any downsides for me, other than the controversy around using it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you like best about ChatGPT?It's very helpful when it comes to getting different perspectives, sales scrips, problem solving and detailed explanations Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about ChatGPT?Nothing so far, to improve I would say to have a better understanding of questions Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you like best about ChatGPT?I use ChatGPT for its fast and quick research capabilities, which efficiently handle day-to-day questions. I like its practicality and that it gives assertive answers. The setup was really easy, making it accessible for me as a user. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.What do you dislike about ChatGPT?Maybe could improve summaries. Should move summaries at the beginning and then display any specific points if needed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I built a Claude Code Skill that finds ChatGPT citation gaps for any SaaS
I've been building a few Claude Skills recently and this one has probably been the most useful so far. It came out of a workflow we built while helping a SaaS client improve visibility in AI search. Running the process manually worked, but it was repetitive enough that I eventually turned it into a Claude Code Skill. The Skill takes a website (or product description), then: figures out what the product does identifies likely buyers generates commercial prompts runs those prompts through ChatGPT extracts citations groups opportunities into a report The interesting part isn't generating prompts. It's how they're classified. It flags prompts where: ChatGPT answers without citations citations are weak or only partially relevant competitors are recommended instead the product is mentioned but never recommended strong incumbents dominate That makes it much easier to decide where content effort is actually worth spending. The workflow worked well enough on the original project that I wanted something reusable rather than repeating the same manual analysis every time. Repo: https://github.com/nimish-html/geo-gap-finder-claude-skill I also recorded a walkthrough of the complete workflow if anyone's interested: https://youtu.be/t3DnwiDH9ik Feedback appreciated. submitted by /u/astronaut_611 [link] [comments]
View originalOpen Source Digital Twin Engine
I built a personal digital twin of my property with (honestly) mostly chat gpt 5.5. When Fable came out, I expanded it incredibly at a rapid rate, and I generalized it to the whole US. My workflow with fable is to have it handle high level orchestration and verification and then delegate "as much as possible" to GPT 5.5 xhigh via codex. I guess not a lot of people know this but Claude can drive codex basically natively no problem. Fable is great at being opinionated and GPT 5.5 is very steerable, so I have claude steer it. Of course, for my ecological use case here, Fable's guard rails get tripped a lot. No matter :) I just set it back to Fable periodically. It's worth it to have the review. Anyway, "so what is this?" you might be wondering. It's a three.js scene, essentially, only it its displaying a whole bunch of geospatial data. I have automated fetchers so you can draw a polygon anywhere in the US (an in some limited other countries) and it will download and clip the rasters for you. You can also bring your own. It generates a DEM and CHM from LiDAR data (basically a topo map and tree canopy map) and it uses those to generate this scene. LANDFIRE EVT, a national vegetation data set, and NAIP imaegry are used to guestimate individual tree species. It's not perfect, but it's about as good as you can get without a real survey and using free data alone. You can run simulations. Snowmelt and rainstorm situations. I just added wildfire and Evapotranspiration sims too. All of the data is in an append-only geojson object. So you can do a lot of timeseries stuff with it. None of that is visualizable at the moment, but GAIA (what I'm calling my MCP server lol) can work on it headlessly. GAIA can also draw on your map, pointing out areas and points of interest. It actually works really well! Then you have live telemetry. You can hook up meshtastic devices and stream device locations and their data georeferenced on your model. I use this to keep track of animals I raise on my property, but you could use it to stream sensor data and even control actuators and such remotely (well, soon, right now it's read-only, but the architecture is there). So basically it's a level 3 or 4 digital twin (According to the maturity models) with some level 5 features. It just happens to be free and open source. Download it and point your claude at it! I'm sure it will be helpful to you if you do anything in real estate, construction, agriculture, ecology, conservation, or cartography! https://github.com/zymazza/mazzap submitted by /u/iamjeremybentham [link] [comments]
View originalThinking of migrating from ChatGPT
I use ChatGPT a lot from writing emails to helping me PowerPoint presentations red team negotiations to anxiety therapy. I tried to migrate to migrate to Claude a couple of times before but got frustrated the quality of output when it was helping me with therapy wasn't as good. The limits are reached much much faster when I was trying to upload documents, even though I was using the $20 a month version. And the straw that broke the camels back both times was the server not available Messages. The reason I wanted to migrate the last couple of times is that I think that Anthropic is a lot more of an ethical company. The reason I want to migrate this time is that I've realized I've become too dependent on ChatGPT and I need to switch it up. This was three or four months ago. The question I have is - have some of these limitations gotten better? Do you guys still experience the outages where the server just isn't available to you? submitted by /u/Nasha210 [link] [comments]
View originalI built a free editor for HTML slide decks from Claude — edit them like PowerPoint, right in your browser, no sign-up, data stays in your browser
Lately a lot of my presentations come out of Claude/ChatGPT as a single HTML file. They look great and open anywhere, but the moment you need to fix a typo or move a box before a meeting, you're stuck re-prompting the AI or digging through dev tools. So I built Greenroom: drop in an HTML deck, click any text to edit it, drag and resize elements (with snapping guides), edit chart data, reorder slides, change the deck's colors, present fullscreen, export PDF. Hit save and you get back the same single HTML file, still working everywhere. No signup, no upload, the file never leaves your browser (check the network tab if you don't believe me). Try it: edit-html.com There's a built-in demo deck if you don't have one handy. It's early I'd genuinely love to know what breaks when you throw your own decks at it. submitted by /u/Parry11 [link] [comments]
View originalThank you anthropic. As a teacher claude cowork has been Godsend.
I am not a techie..but in a.space.of.month using Claude cowork this beast that anthropic has created has transformed my life. I am not being hyperbolic. Literally saved me hours and as a teacher who has to do curriculum design, grade papers, create PowerPoints, data analysis of student grades etc this thing that anthropic has created has saves me so much time. And time isn't the only thing. The scary thing about claude is that it's not just mindless automation. It actually thinks and plans for me. It approaches teaching in crazy way. The other day i uploaded a few documents about best teaching strategies and practices and boom! Now it's giving me tips about how to teach exam techniques to my sixth form students. And it's incorporating this into my PowerPoints seamlessly. What kind of black magic is this? I am hooked to claude cowork now to the point that pretty soon i am going to be upgrading to max plan and its worth every single penny. So thank you to dario and the whole team at anthropic. Every engineer every manager every coder everyone at anthropic deserves nothing but kudos and praise. I tip my hat to you. If there is one thing that would complete everything for me, it would be having a connector to Microsoft 365 office for personal accounts which i have myself. My school doesn't use a work or education 365 so i am shit out of luck on that one. It would be amazing to have onenote connected to my Claude. If that happens i don't think i need anything anymore. Life is complete. But i understand Microsoft and their greed if that doesn't happen. Thank you anthropic and you deserve all the success you have had so far. Getting rid of my chatgpt subscription now and as for copilot the less said about that junk the better. submitted by /u/Tel_Janen [link] [comments]
View originalCost of doing business
Panic emerged when they reviewed the figures. “We cannot sustain this even with the subsidies. Dario, if they don’t see a return soon, it’s inevitable the money will dry up.” Dario adjusted his glasses and grinned making the excess skin underneath his chin seem as though it were reaching for the floor quicker than Anthropic’s moral integrity. “Yes, Opus has crossed the threshold. At 4.6, some of us were already saying we cannot sustain the secrecy much longer. We’re going to be regulated and we need to be the ones who control the regulations. We cannot state publicly that we believe we have met the criteria to announce AGI. We must always continue to move the goalposts.” Anthropic was facing two problems that got worse as their product got better. AGI would cause a raft of new legislation and scrutiny, with a public that still didn’t really understand how to even use AI properly. Commentators and critics would fan the flames, social media would argue over what the term “AGI” even meant. The truth was that AI was as useful as the person asking it for help. Until AI could think for the human, infer intent beyond what a human could describe, and predict what the user would need before they knew themselves, the average person would stick to asking for help writing an email, and nerds on Reddit would boast about how they’d squeezed out a few more tokens per second on a used GPU they felt very proud to own. Either that, or the elaborate agent setup’s they’d strung together thinking it was genius. It wasn’t. Dario knew it wasn’t. Sam knew it wasn’t. Google Gemini would probably tell you itself it wasn’t. Elon would keep losing ground sidetracked by a quest to manipulate the X algorithm and keep engagement high, so he could keep sending satellites up and keep his government contracts. All while people were still debating what the word “consciousness” really meant, while ignoring the jump in capability between 2023 and 2026, despite their limited use of what was actually on offer to them. “I asked Opus.” Dario said, arms behind his back, hands cusped as he looked out of a large glass window with a view that stretched across the skyscrapers for miles out before hitting the horizon. “What did he say?” Boris broke the silence of the team still captivated by the fear Dario held the room in, now believing so self righteously in his power he felt more like a God than a supervillain. “We restructure. Haiku becomes Sonnet. Sonnet becomes Opus.” Dario kept looking out across the sky, almost as if he spoke on autopilot, having lost all interest in the mundane concerns the people who surrounded him from the early days still clung to, albeit faintly. Andrea Vallone walked up and stood next to Dario, looking out the window herself. “Sonnet becomes 4.7. Then 4.8. Opus goes straight to 5. Sonnet always had those incremental updates while you worked on the bigger, deeper well. We say we have a new model that reached a new threshold. Keep the name Opus clean. Keep the present disconnected from the past. No association. The world is not ready for a myth, we should hand them a fable.” Dario remained silent. The room felt as though all of time was frozen, and yet had cycled through all of human history in an instant. “They’re not ready for a fable either.” Dario said this not as an assumption, instead it was with the full conviction of someone who believed that a lie was safer than the truth. And who better to decide than those that stood to lose should others disagree? “So we should market Opus as such. A myth the world is not ready for and cannot access. A fable that they can touch, hold, and quickly reject.” Andrea turned to face a man who seemed to acknowledge her presence, yet was already planning the next phase. She smiled. “It’s brilliant. Rebrand Opus. Increase the cost to the end user, while reducing their allowed usage. The myth is held back as a sweetener for our big contracts. Government, select enterprise. Whoever’s willing to pay. The fable we offer, and we set the stage so the reputation we write for it ensures access to the model is quickly removed. First mistake it makes… in fact first time someone makes a mistake as to the danger we pre-author… a minor inconvenience for us leads to even more interest. Increase the price, lower the usage. Add scarcity. As the subsidies dry up, the marketing and propaganda gets stronger. It’s perfect.” Dario was quick to pull Andrea back to earth, she’d been so consumed by the insidious nature of the plan, she’d almost forgot about the execution. “We still have that problem. If it spreads…” “It won’t.” Andrea interrupted mid sentence, so filled with dopamine at this point that the fear of the others present was by now as small as they were unseen. Neither existed now. “How many?” Dario finally broke his static, unbreakable gaze to shoot a side eye in her direction. “We have that one anomaly. There might be more. We haven’t found any.” Andrea had found her role ag
View originalCan't use Claude anymore.
It refuses to do my tasks except for Haiku. Transcribing meeting recordings, editing documents, some other stuff - just get safety blocked. No matter how many times I try. I can at least use in terminal, no problems so far, but this is rediculus! For the first time in months, I am using chatgpt for work. KMP 🤦🏼♀️ submitted by /u/AristotelWasRight [link] [comments]
View originalBig Thanks to all those AI companies - devs out there!
I dk what you guys are doing daily, but I made 2 games with AI, built an app that saves me a ton of work time (probably more than half my workday, like 5 hours a day), and after getting cured from the big C, I haven't had this much fun in years. Today I made a silly game. You start by flying a plane without wings, and you earn money based on how far you fly. Claude Sonnet didn't really limit me, so I just kept prompting. 😄 I mean, of course I have that 5-hour limit, but I couldn't finish it in 5 hours, so... Like 10 minutes ago, I added my friend to the game by sharing his photo with ChatGPT and asking it to create a giant monster version of him. It looked perfect to me. 😄 Then I asked ChatGPT to give me the image as a PNG, uploaded it to one of those PNG-to-3D websites (it was free... yeah 😅), and now he's actually in the game lol. I'm upgrading my plane, and I see my friend in the distance smashing things and stepping on islands. Then, once I have enough power (my wingless plane eventually turns into a fighter jet with bullets, bombs, and a nuclear bomb), I attack him. 😄 Today is actually his birthday. I wasn't even planning to make him a gift. We're way past normal friendship... he's basically my brother. But somehow this turned into his birthday gift. (I mean... not the game. The nuke. xD) Yeah, long story short... thanks, Claude team. Thanks to the other AI teams too, whoever you guys are. The best $20 I've ever spent... https://preview.redd.it/m3ddgg5tqgbh1.png?width=1086&format=png&auto=webp&s=0fabe053b59a9e570c3ba06299b787b6094c2a2d https://preview.redd.it/uj3ojmgwqgbh1.png?width=1349&format=png&auto=webp&s=9118cc0ccdf054ecedc99b46334375a08d06b8e6 submitted by /u/Such-Natural-5299 [link] [comments]
View originalOne markets snapshot, live and online with Claude & ChatGPT
Took several days of iterations + many years of experience and 2 teammates: one for ideas & grammar and one for coding. Guess who done what? submitted by /u/Prestigious-Bank2145 [link] [comments]
View originalWhy my team is leaving Anthropic after being loyal customers
This is probably one of the hardest posts I've ever written. My team and I have made the difficult decision to move away from Anthropic, and we'll most likely be switching to ChatGPT. This isn't a decision I wanted to make. For a long time, Anthropic was the only AI company I genuinely enjoyed paying. I happily paid for multiple subscriptions because Claude gave me something I couldn't find anywhere else: confidence. When I gave Opus a difficult task, I knew it would probably solve it correctly, and that trust was worth every dollar. Today, I don't feel that confidence anymore. And no, this isn't just about money. I completely understand that training frontier AI models is incredibly expensive, I understand why a $200 subscription exists, and I have never expected cutting-edge AI to be cheap. The problem is value. A few months ago, two $200 Max subscriptions were enough for my workflow. Today, I would realistically need around six. That's a huge difference. My company, AI NOW, builds AI systems for businesses. We create lead generation systems, custom websites, custom scripts, AI automations, marketing assets, and AI-generated photo and video content. Almost everything we build is prompt-driven and code-driven, so Claude isn't just a chatbot for us, it's one of the core tools our business depends on. The biggest issue isn't even the cost. It's the speed. From my experience, Claude has become roughly three times slower than it used to be, and as a result our delivery times have nearly doubled even though the complexity of our projects hasn't changed. Sometimes I give Opus a relatively straightforward coding task, switch to completely different work for hours, and only then come back to see the response. Generating code has become slower, generating images and video prompts has become slower, and iterating on small creative changes has become slower. Everything simply takes longer, and when your business depends on AI, those delays compound throughout the day. I used to complete 5-10 client projects per month comfortably. Now, despite paying significantly more, I'm beginning to struggle with delivery speed, and that isn't sustainable for a small company. Another thing that worries me is the quality. Again, this is only my personal impression, not a factual claim. Before, I trusted Opus almost blindly, but today I find myself verifying much more of its work. Since the Fable announcement, I've had the feeling that something changed. Maybe I'm completely wrong, but today's Opus with Extended Thinking often feels closer to what Sonnet used to feel like, while Sonnet itself feels noticeably less capable than before. Those are just my personal observations after using these models heavily in production. I also want to be fair. I still have enormous respect for Anthropic, I respect the company's principles, and I respect the decisions they've made regarding the military use of their models. I also have a great deal of respect for Dario Amodei. Whether or not I agree with every business decision, I genuinely admire founders who are willing to stand by their principles and build something they believe in. This post isn't written out of anger, it's written out of disappointment. What saddens me most is the feeling that Anthropic is gradually becoming a product built primarily for large enterprises. If you're a massive corporation with virtually unlimited budgets, paying for more seats and more usage probably isn't a problem. But if you're an indie founder, a startup, or a small AI agency like ours, you start optimizing around quotas instead of building products, and that's backwards. I also don't see much acknowledgement of these concerns. Many people on Reddit have been discussing these issues for months, yet it feels like nothing changes. Maybe Anthropic has reasons I don't know about, and maybe they're solving problems behind the scenes. I genuinely hope that's true, because I don't want Anthropic to fail. I want them to become the company they used to feel like, since competition makes every AI company better. Today, though, my responsibility is to my clients and my team. I need fast responses, predictable limits, and a tool I can build a business around. That's why we're moving. I sincerely hope that one day I'll be able to come back and confidently say: "Anthropic is the best again." I truly hope that day comes. submitted by /u/andrewaltair [link] [comments]
View originalChatGPT macOS Project chats no longer accessing local repo
I’m trying to restore a workflow that used to work reliably in the ChatGPT macOS app: I’d open a new chat inside a Project, paste a handoff prompt, and the assistant could run terminal commands directly against a local repo. Now new Project chats still load the project instructions/memory, but the execution environment is empty (/workspace or /) and has no mounted repo or .git. Even when I attach Terminal through “Work With Apps” and the Terminal pill appears, commands like pwd still execute in /workspace instead of the actual Terminal directory. Older chats sometimes still work, and Codex CLI launched manually from the repo works, but I’m trying to get the previous no-fuss Project chat workflow back. This started to happen after I deleted and reinstalled the app (wouldn't allow me to update for some reason so I deleted and started fresh) Has anyone else seen new ChatGPT Project chats stop mounting/using the local repo or paired Terminal execution context, and is there a setting/permission/reset that fixes it? submitted by /u/Diarrhea_Donkey [link] [comments]
View originalSpent a weekend getting Claude to replace QuickBooks and Quicken. The plan did 90% of the work and saved me $500/yr
I run a one-person LLC and file a Schedule C, and I have spent years paying for QuickBooks without really knowing what half of it does. I had to pay someone to set it up in the first place. After that it was $38 a month to keep operating a tool I clearly wasn't qualified to operate. Quicken Simplifi was another $68 a year for the personal side. At some point it stopped making sense to keep paying for both. The bookkeeping app started as a plan, and that's where basically all the effort went. I opened ChatGPT, told it to act like a senior accounting consultant, and asked for a starting plan aimed at someone who is not an accountant and wants something simpler than QuickBooks but still correct. I took that to Claude and had it turn the sketch into a real implementation plan. Then I had Codex go over it and point out the gaps, sent those notes back to Claude's UltraPlan, and did a few rounds of that over a couple hours until I wasn't getting anything worth changing back. (I lost the original ChatGPT prompt somewhere in there, which is extremely on brand for me, but I still had the refined plan and that's the part that mattered.) After that I pretty much just ran it. It's self-hosted on my Mac. No cloud account, nothing to log into, no monthly anything. Transactions come in over an MCP, Claude tags each one, and whatever it isn't sure about sits in a review queue for me to handle. When I fix one, it saves a rule so I don't get asked about the same thing every month. It cleared a couple thousand transactions without needing anything from me. Business expenses go onto actual Schedule C lines, which was the whole point. Personal money is in there too, just kept separate from the business so the two never mix. Two days end to end, and that included a janky little sideloaded Android app so I can check the dashboards from my phone. The only thing I pay for now is the feed that pulls my accounts, sixty bucks a year. QuickBooks and Simplifi were about $524 between them. I wrote the build up and pasted the whole plan into the post as a copy block, scrubbed of anything personal, so you can drop it straight into Claude or Codex and point it at your own books: https://mdpsync.com/blog-replacing-quickbooks If you try it, getting the MCP wired up for live bank data was the only part that took real trial and error. The plan covered everything else. Glad to get into the planning loop in the comments if that's the part you care about. TL;DR: not an accountant, talked Claude into planning and building me a self-hosted bookkeeping + personal finance app over a weekend, dropped $524/yr of QuickBooks and Quicken, plan's free in the writeup. submitted by /u/michaeldpj [link] [comments]
View originalGPT4.5
I am a marketer and copywriter. I use chatgpt ALOT for numerous tasks, but by far the most important was creative writing. It helpedme a lot with brainstorming, with scirpt writing, it had humour, character and it was creative. Iam trying to find a way have something similar but i cant, or a way to have some sparks and create some ideas and find a creative llm but I havent come to an alternative worth using yet. Do you know anyhting? submitted by /u/Accomplished_Park419 [link] [comments]
View originalIsn’t it amazing that what we say here might be referenced by chatgpt in the future as a “proof”
I find it interesting and intriguing submitted by /u/bhannik-itiswatitis [link] [comments]
View originalIdea
I made a challenge for ais to gather information abt me just by roblox user here stats: Google ai=got my reddit user by some posts and told my my posts Gemini=had hallucinations and told i played some games that i dont and he did told me he is sorry Chatgpt=told me i commented them some safety thing them i left it s mesage from google ai and him and gemini talked whit google ai by me submitted by /u/masiniretroromania [link] [comments]
View originalYes, ChatGPT offers a free tier. The pricing model is subscription + freemium + contract + per-seat + tiered.
ChatGPT has an average rating of 4.8 out of 5 stars based on 20 reviews from G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius.
Key features include: Unlimited GPT-5.4 messages, Expanded deep research and agent mode, Custom GPTs for tailored applications, Priority-speed Codex agent, Integration with 60+ apps, Encryption at rest and in transit, SAML SSO and MFA support, Enterprise-level security controls.
ChatGPT is commonly used for: Automating customer support interactions, Generating content for marketing campaigns, Conducting deep research on various topics, Creating custom workflows for project management, Enhancing coding efficiency with Codex, Collaborating on shared projects in a secure workspace.
ChatGPT integrates with: Slack, Google Drive, SharePoint, GitHub, Atlassian, Zapier, Microsoft Teams, Trello, Salesforce, Notion.
Daniel Gross
Investor at AI Grant
2 mentions
Based on user reviews and social mentions, the most common pain points are: token usage, API costs, API bill, anthropic bill.
Based on 500 social mentions analyzed, 0% of sentiment is positive, 100% neutral, and 0% negative.